Konstantin Kisin

The battle over the upcoming by-election in Gorton and Denton has so far been largely uneventful. The Labour Party, which holds the seat, looks set to lose it, as you'd expect. Their leader has, after all, the worst personal satisfaction ratings of any British prime minister since records began. Reform looks set to do well, which with immigration dominating the political conversation is also unsurprising. The Greens are also performing strongly and, like reform, may even win the seat, for reasons I explained in my last video. So far, so predictable.

Mutta sitten Green Candidate Hanna-Spencernin video alkoi käydä rauhoja. Klippi itse asiassa ei ole yllättävää. Se ei edes ole kuitenkaan tarpeeksi keskustella, jos se ei ole yksi yksinkertainen asia. Se on lähettänyt täysin urduksi. Minä olen Hanna-Spencerni.

Bills are increasing and rents are taking us out of homes. Now you might be thinking, look how right wing Konstantin has become. Why does anyone care whether a few unrepresentative areas have a lot of people from a particular community living there? After all, this tends to happen when groups of people move from country to country. People are not atomized individuals, especially in more traditional societies.

British settlers who moved to the new world didn't move in groups of three either. A lot of immigration happens in clusters. It's why so many big cities have a Chinatown. I'm not against Chinatowns. Then again, I've never seen a British politician campaigning in Chinese. I'm aware, as I say this, that some American viewers might find it strange that I take issue with this.

After all, there are many parts of the US where you'll get by just as easily with Spanish as you will with English. There's a big difference between Britain and America, as a British-born Pakistani Uber driver once explained to me in Los Angeles. British people aren't racist, he said. It's just space.

Britain is a small country. America is a big country. When you move to America, you're not taking someone else's space. This reflects in the linguistic differences too. When you become an American citizen, you're called a first generation American. When you become a British citizen, you're a first generation immigrant.

En välttämättä. Se on se, mitä kutsun itseäni, koska se on kulttuurinen ero Yhdysvalloissa ja Amerikassa. Tämä ero on osallistunut jotain toisestaan. Amerikka on pohjautunut itsenäisyyden ja vaihtanut sen kolonialaisista eri puolilla Eurooppaa ja myöhemmin ihmisistä koko maailman.

With the exception of the people brought there against their will, they all effectively took the land from someone else. Whether your ancestors did the initial taking or moved there more recently, you still benefit from that land being taken by living on it. The native population of North America is dwarfed by the more recent arrivals. I say more recent and not recent, because when it comes to land, someone always took it from someone else.

With the exception of Australian aboriginals, there are no people in the world who can claim they were the first modern humans to settle on land they currently occupy outside a handful of tiny, isolated island communities. Everyone else took the land they currently live on from someone else.

Ja koska amerikkojen on yhteinen tunne olevansa historiallisesti nykyisiä tulevaisuudet, heidän on vain niin vaikea välttämättä muistaa muiden ihmisten amerikkojen unelmansa, joita heidän vanhemmat katsoivat, vaikka he tekevät sen legaattisesti. Kuten jo kertoisin aiemmin, Britain oli hyvin etnillinen ja kulttuurillinen homogeeninen yhteiskunta.

Sinun mielestäsi, onko se hyvä vai huono, ei ole tärkeää mitä minä sanon täällä. Tiedotus on, että melkein kaikki elämässä tänä päivänä, London ja muut britiläiset kaupungit ovat menneet ylöspäin ylöspäin natalaisista britiläisistä, ja ovat menneet yliopistoon. 1991, 35 vuotta sitten, London oli luotettavasti 80% vihreä britiläinen. Vuonna 2021, 30 vuotta sitten, se oli 36,8% vihreä britiläinen.

Over 75% of the country's population is over the age of 35. This dramatic change happened in the lifetimes of three out of four people in Britain today. And that's not a political statement, it's a fact. Forget about the skin colors and races of the people involved. When European settlers came to North America and within a couple of generations became the more populous people on the eastern seaboard of today's United States, on a scale from one, dissatisfied, to ten, delighted, how happy do you think the natives were?

Konstantin, et voi kuitenkaan määrittää nortalaisen puolustuksen ympäristöjä nortalaisessa Amerikassa vahvistuneena maahanmuuttajana, vahvistuneena eurooppalaisena syrjinnässä, vahvistuneeseen ja etniskäytäntöön. Ja olet oikeassa. Ei ole mitenkään luonnollinen henkilö, joka olisi tehtänyt sen. Mutta sanotaan, että kolonistit ovat muuttuneet Amerikalle, koska muutama nortalaisen puolustuksen johtajat ovat kiinnostaneet heidät, vaikka heidän nortalaisen kansalaisuudestaan on kerrottu usein.

Britain after all voted against mass immigration in 2010, 2015, 2016 with Brexit, 2017, 2019 and 2024 when they punished the Tories for letting immigration spin out of control. So in our example, say there was no war, no violence and the displacement happened entirely peacefully and without coercion. Would you concede that in that situation quite a lot of Native Americans might have a few questions about whether their leaders made a better decision than the one they elected them to make?

This is why I didn't agree with Sir Jim Ratcliffe using the word colonization to describe what's happened in Britain. But it's also why I refuse to criticize him for it. Like all of us, he's trying to feel his way towards the right word to describe what's happened in much of Europe in the last few decades.

It's hard because what's happened is completely unprecedented. Never in the history of our countries have our rulers decided that opening the borders to so many people from the rest of the world was a good idea. Indeed, at any other point in human history, the suggestion that we should pursue this course of action would have been met with bemusement, to put it very, very mildly.

Se on tapahtunut hyvin pitkällä aikavälillä, eikä ainoastaan Britsin ihmisille, vaan heidän haluamistaan. Sanoja kuten invaation ja kolonisaatio, joita internetin edgelähtöinen sivuilta käyttää, kuuluvat ihmisille, joiden rauha on tuotettu ihmisille itseään. Siksi Be Kind Brigade sanoo, että ihmisiä, joilla on huolimatta maahanmuuttajia, rauhoittaa. Mutta 95% rauhaa, jota näen, on tuotettu ihmisille, jotka tekevät tämän.

British politicians of all three major parties. I don't hate other people for wanting to come here. Britain is wonderful. Why wouldn't they? I don't even hate the politicians who've done this. Some of them at least have the excuse of being incompetent and naive. But the people I am starting to hate are the liars and the hypocrites who want to have it both ways.

If you say that too many people in Britain don't speak English, live in a powerless society and don't integrate, you'll be shouted down and called names by the very same people who are campaigning in a foreign language. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Either multiculturalism is all hunky dory, diversity is our greatest strength, and if only the great unwashed would stop grumbling about immigration, the kind, decent, welcoming gardenistas of North London could finally live peacefully in glorious citizen of the world harmony,

tai sinun täytyy käsitellä, että on osa maata, jossa jos haluat saada valtaja, sinun täytyy puhua heidän kielensä, eikä meidän maamme kielensä. Monet ihmisistä, jotka käsittelevät maailmanmuutoksen poliitikkoa, tekevät sen vain siksi, että he käsittelevät muutamia seurauksia ja saavat monia hyödyksiä. Se on periaatteellinen asia heidän tekemisensä. Jos poliisi hyödyttää sinua enemmän kuin se hyödyttää sinua, se on hyvä poliisi sinulle. Mutta kuten Argentinian presidentti Javier Mele sanoi aiemmin,