Zico Colter

And so there's obviously a middle ground you have to and you have a total line here and you have to adapt to the reality of the situation on the ground and kind of go from there in many ways.

And so there's obviously a middle ground you have to and you have a total line here and you have to adapt to the reality of the situation on the ground and kind of go from there in many ways.

And so there's obviously a middle ground you have to and you have a total line here and you have to adapt to the reality of the situation on the ground and kind of go from there in many ways.

And this is maybe what I was pointing out before is that AI, when it comes to things like misinformation, it did not invent misinformation, AI, it can argue there was misinformation and propaganda and this stuff long before there was AI. You can argue it's an accelerant for everything, for a lot of things that we have, right? But it does not invent these things.

And this is maybe what I was pointing out before is that AI, when it comes to things like misinformation, it did not invent misinformation, AI, it can argue there was misinformation and propaganda and this stuff long before there was AI. You can argue it's an accelerant for everything, for a lot of things that we have, right? But it does not invent these things.

And this is maybe what I was pointing out before is that AI, when it comes to things like misinformation, it did not invent misinformation, AI, it can argue there was misinformation and propaganda and this stuff long before there was AI. You can argue it's an accelerant for everything, for a lot of things that we have, right? But it does not invent these things.

And my hope, at least, is that a lot of our existing social and economic and governmental structures can continue to provide the same guidance they provided for our current take on moderation and things like this, even in an AI world.

And my hope, at least, is that a lot of our existing social and economic and governmental structures can continue to provide the same guidance they provided for our current take on moderation and things like this, even in an AI world.

And my hope, at least, is that a lot of our existing social and economic and governmental structures can continue to provide the same guidance they provided for our current take on moderation and things like this, even in an AI world.

I hold two beliefs at the same time. Like a lot of new technologies, there's absolutely a role for regulation and for governments to provide frameworks for ensuring that new technologies do benefit the world. This is why we form governments to a certain extent. In that umbrella, I believe there is absolutely the need to better understand how and where we can regulate AI as a technology.

I hold two beliefs at the same time. Like a lot of new technologies, there's absolutely a role for regulation and for governments to provide frameworks for ensuring that new technologies do benefit the world. This is why we form governments to a certain extent. In that umbrella, I believe there is absolutely the need to better understand how and where we can regulate AI as a technology.

I hold two beliefs at the same time. Like a lot of new technologies, there's absolutely a role for regulation and for governments to provide frameworks for ensuring that new technologies do benefit the world. This is why we form governments to a certain extent. In that umbrella, I believe there is absolutely the need to better understand how and where we can regulate AI as a technology.

I also, though, think that maybe to your point of the examples you were given, a lot of the details about how those regulations sometimes evolve can be a bit misguided or miss the point.

I also, though, think that maybe to your point of the examples you were given, a lot of the details about how those regulations sometimes evolve can be a bit misguided or miss the point.

I also, though, think that maybe to your point of the examples you were given, a lot of the details about how those regulations sometimes evolve can be a bit misguided or miss the point.

Or somehow, when I read them, basically, they're going to become dated in a matter of months, because they're dealing with things and they're approaching the problem from a way that doesn't really match the nature of how these systems are really developed in practice. I think that it is much easier. We have a much better handle on regulating the downstream uses of AI.

Or somehow, when I read them, basically, they're going to become dated in a matter of months, because they're dealing with things and they're approaching the problem from a way that doesn't really match the nature of how these systems are really developed in practice. I think that it is much easier. We have a much better handle on regulating the downstream uses of AI.

Or somehow, when I read them, basically, they're going to become dated in a matter of months, because they're dealing with things and they're approaching the problem from a way that doesn't really match the nature of how these systems are really developed in practice. I think that it is much easier. We have a much better handle on regulating the downstream uses of AI.

Like when it comes to misinformation, we already have laws that deal with sort of libel and things like this.

Like when it comes to misinformation, we already have laws that deal with sort of libel and things like this.