Tucker Carlson

turn it over to you to explain what are these lines in the sky that we have all seen?

So you just said a bunch of amazing things, all of which I just want to say sound plausible to me.

But let's just back up a little bit.

So you're calling this geoengineering.

The term chemtrails, you say, is a propaganda term designed to discredit people who ask sincere questions about what the hell am I looking at?

Okay, so the first line of the Wikipedia entry points out something true, which is that when you look at these lines in the sky and you're told, well, it's just condensation, it's water vapor.

You know that maybe that's not the right explanation because water vapor dissipates and doesn't remain in the sky for like 20 minutes after the plane leaves.

So that suggests bigger particles in the mist, that particulate matter in the mist.

Is that correct?

So if I understand what you're saying,

What we're watching is an attempt, I assume by governments, and we'll get into who's doing this, to mitigate the effects of climate change, to reflect back rays from the sun so that the Earth doesn't warm at a pace that is dangerous to whatever they think it's dangerous to.

But this is a global warming mitigation effort.

Is that correct?

That is the stated purpose.

We know this is... That is the stated purpose.

So I think that's plausible because there is so much energy, commitment, sincere commitment in some cases, obviously fake commitment in others, and so much money behind this effort to mitigate global warming that that makes absolute sense.

It is a religion.

And you're saying that you were not

originally aware of this or interested in it, but because you live off grid and you derive a lot of your electricity from solar and you clearly have an engineer brain, you were wondering like, why the hell is my solar not working correctly?

And that got you into this process of learning about it?