Tucker Carlson

And we think we have found that person.

Dane Wigington of Northern California has been on this subject for almost 30 years and has compiled what we believe, after looking at it pretty carefully, is the most comprehensive account of what we're seeing.

And it's very bad.

Dane, thanks a lot for joining us.

I never knew what to think of this topic, chemtrails or contrails or the stripes in the sky that linger after airplanes pass.

I don't remember them as a child.

They're very common now.

I've heard people say there's something up, something nefarious going on.

So I go to Wikipedia to see what they say.

And I want to read you the Wikipedia entry, the first part of it on this question, okay?

You may have seen this and I'm quoting from Wikipedia as of this morning.

The chemtrail conspiracy theory is the erroneous belief that long lasting condensation trails left in the sky by high flying aircraft

are actually, quote, chemtrails consisting of chemical or biological agents sprayed for nefarious purposes undisclosed to the general public, period.

Believers in this conspiracy theory say that while normal contrails dissipate relatively quickly, contrails that linger must contain additional substances.

Those who subscribe to the theory speculate that the purpose of the chemical release may be solar radiation management,

weather modification, psychological manipulation, human population control, biological or chemical warfare, or testing of a biological or chemical agent on the population and that the trails are causing respiratory illnesses and other health problems.

So I read that, and the purpose, of course, of that paragraph is not to illuminate what this might be, but to attack anyone who speculates about what it might be.

It's a form itself of psychological warfare, of propaganda.

And when I read that, I said to myself, there's clearly something going on because the people who control Wikipedia, which would be the intel agencies, as we know, don't want anyone to talk about this.

So with that lengthy preface explaining why this conversation is taking place, I will