Konstantin Kisin

adding him to his signal group is a good thing and i think one of the things that you're about to see is a big pivot that i think this space is going to split into those people and look i'll give you an example i've had run-ins with glenn greenwald online we've had him on our show i said some things about him that were not complimentary after you know in part of of our discussions whatever

adding him to his signal group is a good thing and i think one of the things that you're about to see is a big pivot that i think this space is going to split into those people and look i'll give you an example i've had run-ins with glenn greenwald online we've had him on our show i said some things about him that were not complimentary after you know in part of of our discussions whatever

But he's been very principled on things like this, as have many other people. But there's also going to be a section of people who they never really cared about the truth. They never really cared about being balanced. They just care about their side. And to them, it's like red team, blue team.

But he's been very principled on things like this, as have many other people. But there's also going to be a section of people who they never really cared about the truth. They never really cared about being balanced. They just care about their side. And to them, it's like red team, blue team.

But he's been very principled on things like this, as have many other people. But there's also going to be a section of people who they never really cared about the truth. They never really cared about being balanced. They just care about their side. And to them, it's like red team, blue team.

They're on team red, and they'll ignore everything that team red does that's bad and focus only on what team blue does. And I think that's going to be a big split in this space.

They're on team red, and they'll ignore everything that team red does that's bad and focus only on what team blue does. And I think that's going to be a big split in this space.

They're on team red, and they'll ignore everything that team red does that's bad and focus only on what team blue does. And I think that's going to be a big split in this space.

But that guy is in, and I think, look, neither of us is American, so this is just an outside perspective, and it's up to Americans how they run their government and blah, blah, blah, blah. But it's 100% accurate. But from my perspective, I would say the same thing about the U.K.,

But that guy is in, and I think, look, neither of us is American, so this is just an outside perspective, and it's up to Americans how they run their government and blah, blah, blah, blah. But it's 100% accurate. But from my perspective, I would say the same thing about the U.K.,

But that guy is in, and I think, look, neither of us is American, so this is just an outside perspective, and it's up to Americans how they run their government and blah, blah, blah, blah. But it's 100% accurate. But from my perspective, I would say the same thing about the U.K.,

If you get people into power that you think are better than the people that are there now, you nonetheless want them to be accountable. You nonetheless want them to admit mistakes and correct mistakes. You nonetheless want them to... to have their feet held to the fire for things that they do that are fair.

If you get people into power that you think are better than the people that are there now, you nonetheless want them to be accountable. You nonetheless want them to admit mistakes and correct mistakes. You nonetheless want them to... to have their feet held to the fire for things that they do that are fair.

If you get people into power that you think are better than the people that are there now, you nonetheless want them to be accountable. You nonetheless want them to admit mistakes and correct mistakes. You nonetheless want them to... to have their feet held to the fire for things that they do that are fair.

And I think the strategy that the White House employed in this issue was very strange because they admitted it was a mistake. They admitted it was real. Several people, Tulsi Gabbard included, said it was a mistake. I think Mike Walsh himself said it was a mistake. But they also, at the same time, tried to attack the journalist for... reporting being added to a signal group.

And I think the strategy that the White House employed in this issue was very strange because they admitted it was a mistake. They admitted it was real. Several people, Tulsi Gabbard included, said it was a mistake. I think Mike Walsh himself said it was a mistake. But they also, at the same time, tried to attack the journalist for... reporting being added to a signal group.

And I think the strategy that the White House employed in this issue was very strange because they admitted it was a mistake. They admitted it was real. Several people, Tulsi Gabbard included, said it was a mistake. I think Mike Walsh himself said it was a mistake. But they also, at the same time, tried to attack the journalist for... reporting being added to a signal group.

Every journalist in history would have done that, right? Would have published that story and would have done it the way that he did. So it's just an attempt to pretend that a mistake wasn't made, even though you've admitted a mistake. It doesn't make any sense. And I think the fastest way to lose credibility with sensible people

Every journalist in history would have done that, right? Would have published that story and would have done it the way that he did. So it's just an attempt to pretend that a mistake wasn't made, even though you've admitted a mistake. It doesn't make any sense. And I think the fastest way to lose credibility with sensible people

Every journalist in history would have done that, right? Would have published that story and would have done it the way that he did. So it's just an attempt to pretend that a mistake wasn't made, even though you've admitted a mistake. It doesn't make any sense. And I think the fastest way to lose credibility with sensible people