Andrew Gruel
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
I like talking about it through food because that's approachable and people understand it as opposed to a lot of the obfuscation that we see in other areas of the government. But now look right now, right? Geoengineering. We're seeing a lot about cloud seeding and these chemtrails, et cetera. Let's put the chemtrails aside. Let's just talk about geoengineering in general.
and manipulating the environment, the air above us. That is a fact. That is a proven fact. And so much of it hasn't been studied. And yet the government kind of controls those mechanisms by which they're engineering the ecosystem. And what's the long-term effect of that going to be? Some of it is said to be good right now, just like it could have been with GMOs in the 60s and 70s.
and manipulating the environment, the air above us. That is a fact. That is a proven fact. And so much of it hasn't been studied. And yet the government kind of controls those mechanisms by which they're engineering the ecosystem. And what's the long-term effect of that going to be? Some of it is said to be good right now, just like it could have been with GMOs in the 60s and 70s.
But now fast forward five decades, and what do we have going on?
But now fast forward five decades, and what do we have going on?
Now it seems like she's got this long-term dry eye situation. I think she's been hanging out with the chickens at night, but we can talk about that behind closed doors.
Now it seems like she's got this long-term dry eye situation. I think she's been hanging out with the chickens at night, but we can talk about that behind closed doors.
Just a mere question itself should not be a catalyst for backlash and being called a conspiracy theorist. And this is what I see out of Maha, right? Everybody kind of has their own definition. Some are very, very specific. Some are kind of really granular. And in my case, it's a bit more nuanced.
Just a mere question itself should not be a catalyst for backlash and being called a conspiracy theorist. And this is what I see out of Maha, right? Everybody kind of has their own definition. Some are very, very specific. Some are kind of really granular. And in my case, it's a bit more nuanced.
And I think from a much grander perspective in the sense that, number one, we're talking about all this. That's key. Number two, the information is transparent. I don't believe we're going to get into a world where we completely flip the government upside down and we're able to shake out big pharma and all the corporate interest that's already stitched into the framework of the government.
And I think from a much grander perspective in the sense that, number one, we're talking about all this. That's key. Number two, the information is transparent. I don't believe we're going to get into a world where we completely flip the government upside down and we're able to shake out big pharma and all the corporate interest that's already stitched into the framework of the government.
Instead, I believe that it's going to be a one or two or three step process. We got to stew the meat. We can't boil it. So what I see happening right now is that the media is trying to create conflict within the Maha Maga movement because it scares them. Because as Jack said, it's one of the most powerful political movements we've seen in probably 100 years.
Instead, I believe that it's going to be a one or two or three step process. We got to stew the meat. We can't boil it. So what I see happening right now is that the media is trying to create conflict within the Maha Maga movement because it scares them. Because as Jack said, it's one of the most powerful political movements we've seen in probably 100 years.
And in what they're doing, though, is they're telling on themselves because now we're in this stage one piece of the conversation and we're all talking about it. And now it's under this microscope. People are going to be loud about it.
And in what they're doing, though, is they're telling on themselves because now we're in this stage one piece of the conversation and we're all talking about it. And now it's under this microscope. People are going to be loud about it.
And it's my goal here to get people to understand it so that if anything, if this thing does start to get pushed through, that there's labeling and there's no mandates, there's full transparency. transparency on this from the food all the way through that supply chain. And that in and of itself is a bigger success from what we saw in the previous administration.
And it's my goal here to get people to understand it so that if anything, if this thing does start to get pushed through, that there's labeling and there's no mandates, there's full transparency. transparency on this from the food all the way through that supply chain. And that in and of itself is a bigger success from what we saw in the previous administration.
So to that point, I give it two thumbs up.
So to that point, I give it two thumbs up.
Yeah. I mean, already Wellness Farms, which is the arm of kind of the wellness company that's going to be focusing on food, we're bringing together a really great portfolio of products from great local beef to eggs to chicken to, sorry, poultry, and then some perishables as well as talking about freeze-dried and prepared meals, seed oil-free.