Thomas

No, that's good.

No, that's good.

Absolutely.

Absolutely.

I'm with you all the way. And we get back to, does it have to be a big, beautiful bill? The tax package that's in there is pretty good, right? Because it continues all the extension, it extends everything from the Tax Good Jobs Act. But it also gives you the no tax on tips, no tax on seniors, no tax on overtime, those types of things. I can't remember if there's a fourth one in there.

I'm with you all the way. And we get back to, does it have to be a big, beautiful bill? The tax package that's in there is pretty good, right? Because it continues all the extension, it extends everything from the Tax Good Jobs Act. But it also gives you the no tax on tips, no tax on seniors, no tax on overtime, those types of things. I can't remember if there's a fourth one in there.

How about if you just did that bill first? What would it look like if you did that?

How about if you just did that bill first? What would it look like if you did that?

Well, you know, there was so many ways to do it. The president wanted a big, beautiful bill. And that's fine.

Well, you know, there was so many ways to do it. The president wanted a big, beautiful bill. And that's fine.

Yeah, and I told him, I said, I actually support a big, beautiful bill if we use the leverage right to get everybody on. I mean, so you have the salt states, right? I mean, you've got a group of people there. This is a huge thing. Yeah, this is the state and local tax. And they want other Americans to subsidize their high property taxes.

Yeah, and I told him, I said, I actually support a big, beautiful bill if we use the leverage right to get everybody on. I mean, so you have the salt states, right? I mean, you've got a group of people there. This is a huge thing. Yeah, this is the state and local tax. And they want other Americans to subsidize their high property taxes.

to the tune of about $250 billion over 10 years was too little for them. They wanted more.

to the tune of about $250 billion over 10 years was too little for them. They wanted more.

Totally.

Totally.

It's both. I thought so, yes. But the bottom line is the offer, it was in the bill. It was in this bill, Charlie, giving up to $30,000 deduction. That would have cost us $250 billion plus over 10 years.

It's both. I thought so, yes. But the bottom line is the offer, it was in the bill. It was in this bill, Charlie, giving up to $30,000 deduction. That would have cost us $250 billion plus over 10 years.

continue no no you're right i mean that's the that's what i call the restoration of federalism that trump's actually getting into and and he's doing a great job and you see it all over what he's doing by cutting down the size of the federal government but i mean so there's just some of just some other issues that i i hope we work through andy biggs is going to come back we're 100 behind him biggs for arizona.com we got a big event coming up in two weeks andy keep fighting for what's right thank you thank you charlie

continue no no you're right i mean that's the that's what i call the restoration of federalism that trump's actually getting into and and he's doing a great job and you see it all over what he's doing by cutting down the size of the federal government but i mean so there's just some of just some other issues that i i hope we work through andy biggs is going to come back we're 100 behind him biggs for arizona.com we got a big event coming up in two weeks andy keep fighting for what's right thank you thank you charlie