Susan Glasser

So there's that we can talk about. But also to your point, I just think the undermining of NATO has already occurred, even short of formally pulling out. You know, our whole premise of NATO is essentially collective mutual defense, right? All for one, one for all. We're attacked on 9-11. That's the only time NATO has ever invoked this principle of collective defense.

So there's that we can talk about. But also to your point, I just think the undermining of NATO has already occurred, even short of formally pulling out. You know, our whole premise of NATO is essentially collective mutual defense, right? All for one, one for all. We're attacked on 9-11. That's the only time NATO has ever invoked this principle of collective defense.

So there's that we can talk about. But also to your point, I just think the undermining of NATO has already occurred, even short of formally pulling out. You know, our whole premise of NATO is essentially collective mutual defense, right? All for one, one for all. We're attacked on 9-11. That's the only time NATO has ever invoked this principle of collective defense.

Donald Trump, do you believe right now that Donald Trump would go to war to protect Estonia?

Donald Trump, do you believe right now that Donald Trump would go to war to protect Estonia?

Donald Trump, do you believe right now that Donald Trump would go to war to protect Estonia?

Well, the Baltics are covered by NATO. They are members of NATO. We are legally obliged to defend NATO. And by the way, I know we're going to talk about Greenland later. OK, just think about this. Wrap your mind around this insane situation that is an only in the Trump era situation. Denmark, of course, you know, is the power over Greenland right now.

Well, the Baltics are covered by NATO. They are members of NATO. We are legally obliged to defend NATO. And by the way, I know we're going to talk about Greenland later. OK, just think about this. Wrap your mind around this insane situation that is an only in the Trump era situation. Denmark, of course, you know, is the power over Greenland right now.

Well, the Baltics are covered by NATO. They are members of NATO. We are legally obliged to defend NATO. And by the way, I know we're going to talk about Greenland later. OK, just think about this. Wrap your mind around this insane situation that is an only in the Trump era situation. Denmark, of course, you know, is the power over Greenland right now.

It is a NATO member, an ally of the United States in good standing. If we militarily took over Greenland, we'd also be obliged to defend Germany. Greenland, from our own takeover. You don't go to war with your allies, people. And again, it's really a remarkable thing. Trump, in that sense, has already made NATO's Article 5, the whole foundation of the treaty, a dead letter.

It is a NATO member, an ally of the United States in good standing. If we militarily took over Greenland, we'd also be obliged to defend Germany. Greenland, from our own takeover. You don't go to war with your allies, people. And again, it's really a remarkable thing. Trump, in that sense, has already made NATO's Article 5, the whole foundation of the treaty, a dead letter.

It is a NATO member, an ally of the United States in good standing. If we militarily took over Greenland, we'd also be obliged to defend Germany. Greenland, from our own takeover. You don't go to war with your allies, people. And again, it's really a remarkable thing. Trump, in that sense, has already made NATO's Article 5, the whole foundation of the treaty, a dead letter.

Because you laughed out loud when I asked, would we defend Estonia? But that, in fact, is legally what we're obliged to do.

Because you laughed out loud when I asked, would we defend Estonia? But that, in fact, is legally what we're obliged to do.

Because you laughed out loud when I asked, would we defend Estonia? But that, in fact, is legally what we're obliged to do.

The United States is legally obliged to do so. That's,

The United States is legally obliged to do so. That's,

The United States is legally obliged to do so. That's,

Well, to be clear, by the way, we already have a U.S. military presence in- But I meant like combat troops. Exactly. And it's a reminder that Putin has won in every possible respect already by the fact of Donald Trump's reelection. So now we're just- learning the details. And it's not an accident that the Russian state media, Russian newspapers calling this Putin's success already.

Well, to be clear, by the way, we already have a U.S. military presence in- But I meant like combat troops. Exactly. And it's a reminder that Putin has won in every possible respect already by the fact of Donald Trump's reelection. So now we're just- learning the details. And it's not an accident that the Russian state media, Russian newspapers calling this Putin's success already.