Sebastian Raffaele

The most beautiful thing to watch because these guys, they wake up and they're so passionate about making this better. And that doesn't always translate into success. But just seeing the passion, that's all I really care about at the end of the day. The success in making the algorithm better is something that just happens naturally through having passion for your workers.

The most beautiful thing to watch because these guys, they wake up and they're so passionate about making this better. And that doesn't always translate into success. But just seeing the passion, that's all I really care about at the end of the day. The success in making the algorithm better is something that just happens naturally through having passion for your workers.

The most beautiful thing to watch because these guys, they wake up and they're so passionate about making this better. And that doesn't always translate into success. But just seeing the passion, that's all I really care about at the end of the day. The success in making the algorithm better is something that just happens naturally through having passion for your workers.

watching these guys build it out and where the product is going it's really exciting i do feel like we're strapped onto a rocket ship at the moment and we won't make the mistake of scaling too fast again but it's almost feeling like now this thing's going to scale quickly organically and this is the position we've always wanted to be in let's switch to you tell me about who influences the way that you work name a person or many persons or something that you look up to and why

watching these guys build it out and where the product is going it's really exciting i do feel like we're strapped onto a rocket ship at the moment and we won't make the mistake of scaling too fast again but it's almost feeling like now this thing's going to scale quickly organically and this is the position we've always wanted to be in let's switch to you tell me about who influences the way that you work name a person or many persons or something that you look up to and why

watching these guys build it out and where the product is going it's really exciting i do feel like we're strapped onto a rocket ship at the moment and we won't make the mistake of scaling too fast again but it's almost feeling like now this thing's going to scale quickly organically and this is the position we've always wanted to be in let's switch to you tell me about who influences the way that you work name a person or many persons or something that you look up to and why

Jim Simons, he's a mathematician and quantitative trader. He's the founder of Renaissance Technologies. They're essentially a hedge fund from quite a long time ago. And the cool thing about them is AI has become this buzzword that everyone's so excited about, but people don't realize AI has been around for like 20 or 30 years.

Jim Simons, he's a mathematician and quantitative trader. He's the founder of Renaissance Technologies. They're essentially a hedge fund from quite a long time ago. And the cool thing about them is AI has become this buzzword that everyone's so excited about, but people don't realize AI has been around for like 20 or 30 years.

Jim Simons, he's a mathematician and quantitative trader. He's the founder of Renaissance Technologies. They're essentially a hedge fund from quite a long time ago. And the cool thing about them is AI has become this buzzword that everyone's so excited about, but people don't realize AI has been around for like 20 or 30 years.

So Jim Simons was building backtesting and reprocessing environments, and they were running them in the 80s and the 90s. So these guys were so ahead of the curve. The reason I look up to him

So Jim Simons was building backtesting and reprocessing environments, and they were running them in the 80s and the 90s. So these guys were so ahead of the curve. The reason I look up to him

So Jim Simons was building backtesting and reprocessing environments, and they were running them in the 80s and the 90s. So these guys were so ahead of the curve. The reason I look up to him

is he's the kind of person who always had vision for what he wanted to do but really took him a very long time to get to where he wanted to be even at 52 years old he was still sitting in front of the market trying to understand how to pull money out of it and he still hadn't done it right so someone like that inspires me and i inspire to be like him because of his tenacity and also his ability to block out the noise

is he's the kind of person who always had vision for what he wanted to do but really took him a very long time to get to where he wanted to be even at 52 years old he was still sitting in front of the market trying to understand how to pull money out of it and he still hadn't done it right so someone like that inspires me and i inspire to be like him because of his tenacity and also his ability to block out the noise

is he's the kind of person who always had vision for what he wanted to do but really took him a very long time to get to where he wanted to be even at 52 years old he was still sitting in front of the market trying to understand how to pull money out of it and he still hadn't done it right so someone like that inspires me and i inspire to be like him because of his tenacity and also his ability to block out the noise

He was working with genius mathematicians and he was a genius himself, but they were telling him, Jim, this model and what you're trying to do, it's not going to work. You can't pull money out of the market.

He was working with genius mathematicians and he was a genius himself, but they were telling him, Jim, this model and what you're trying to do, it's not going to work. You can't pull money out of the market.

He was working with genius mathematicians and he was a genius himself, but they were telling him, Jim, this model and what you're trying to do, it's not going to work. You can't pull money out of the market.

And back then, conceptually automated systems was something people just laughed at because they were in a traditional financial environment like the stock market where a lot of these guys on Wall Street were using intuition and experience and news and fundamental analysis and things like this. And Jim was trying to bring forward something that for the most of them, they just laughed at.

And back then, conceptually automated systems was something people just laughed at because they were in a traditional financial environment like the stock market where a lot of these guys on Wall Street were using intuition and experience and news and fundamental analysis and things like this. And Jim was trying to bring forward something that for the most of them, they just laughed at.