Nufar Gaspar

So I didn't try it again.

So my point is that often even the co-pilots or the tools that they do have access can do way more than what they try.

And I always want to encourage people to go back like even every other week just to see how fast these tools evolve.

But like there is no...

We're around either buying, like just expanding the budgets or hoping that the major players will improve and they do.

So that's why I'm not that concerned.

I believe that we're, I don't know, a few months to maybe a year tops where the most relevant tools, even if they're not the state of the art, they are good enough for most of what will yield the value for the employees.

So if you're frustrated by your employer, wait a little bit longer and I believe that it will be sorted.

So first of all, that's something that I have a lot of experience because I led such teams within Intel, so I know a lot about it.

By the way, the one thing that I tell managers that are contemplating hiring is be willing to open your wallet because that's a very difficult person to hire these days.

But when they do, one thing that is a clear differentiator between whether these builders will be successful or not is how plugged in they are to the business and the relationship with the business team.

If it is being perceived like I'm the almighty builder, you have to do whatever I say, then there is an internal clash.

And then we're talking about not invented here between vendors and company.

We're talking about not invented here between groups.

And that's probably one of the worst ways that you can leverage your internal builders.

So make sure that, first of all, that it's very clear what is their scope versus what is the team scope, meaning that there needs to be a clear guardrail that below that the teams get to build for themselves and above that it has to go to the builder and what's the rationale to avoid frustration.

and also make sure that the business rationale and the technology rationale are clear to both sides, such that there is a higher likelihood of the builder to build something that people will actually use.

And surprisingly, companies or employees are often more strict versus something that was built internally versus a vendor.

So the expectations are extremely high, and it's not easy to succeed as an internal builder within especially large companies.

So obviously I don't have the full view of, but from what I'm seeing, there is still a high focus on the basics of AI and chasing the tool type of training.