Neil Freiman
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Welcome back to the short week. Hope you had a relaxing weekend. Look, there are a lot of things to worry about in this world, but maybe getting attacked by a shark is not one of them. According to a new report from the Florida Museum of Natural History, 2024 was a quote, exceptionally calm year for shark bites.
There were only 47 unprovoked attacks around the world last year, down 22 from the previous year and far below the 10 year average of 70. Toby, I think it's time. I'm ready to watch Jaws again.
There were only 47 unprovoked attacks around the world last year, down 22 from the previous year and far below the 10 year average of 70. Toby, I think it's time. I'm ready to watch Jaws again.
There were only 47 unprovoked attacks around the world last year, down 22 from the previous year and far below the 10 year average of 70. Toby, I think it's time. I'm ready to watch Jaws again.
Your messaging could be fantastic, but if your ad shows up in front of the wrong person, then it's not effective. LinkedIn ads can't save your relationship, but it can help you target and filter your audience by industry, company, and role. No more wasting time and money on the wrong people. It's 2025.
Your messaging could be fantastic, but if your ad shows up in front of the wrong person, then it's not effective. LinkedIn ads can't save your relationship, but it can help you target and filter your audience by industry, company, and role. No more wasting time and money on the wrong people. It's 2025.
Your messaging could be fantastic, but if your ad shows up in front of the wrong person, then it's not effective. LinkedIn ads can't save your relationship, but it can help you target and filter your audience by industry, company, and role. No more wasting time and money on the wrong people. It's 2025.
Yeah. So how did JP Morgan find out that these email lists that they acquired was not as big as they thought? Just months after the deal closed, they sent out marketing emails to a batch of 400,000 supposed Frank customers. They found out that only 28 percent of the emails were even delivered and just one point one percent were open.
Yeah. So how did JP Morgan find out that these email lists that they acquired was not as big as they thought? Just months after the deal closed, they sent out marketing emails to a batch of 400,000 supposed Frank customers. They found out that only 28 percent of the emails were even delivered and just one point one percent were open.
Yeah. So how did JP Morgan find out that these email lists that they acquired was not as big as they thought? Just months after the deal closed, they sent out marketing emails to a batch of 400,000 supposed Frank customers. They found out that only 28 percent of the emails were even delivered and just one point one percent were open.
That's according to the lawsuit that JP Morgan filed against Javis, which is separate from this government case. So if I saw something like 1.1% were open, that'd be bad for the Morning Brew newsletter. It's even bad for a company you paid $175 million for. So they started digging in and found, and they contend that most of this list was made up.
That's according to the lawsuit that JP Morgan filed against Javis, which is separate from this government case. So if I saw something like 1.1% were open, that'd be bad for the Morning Brew newsletter. It's even bad for a company you paid $175 million for. So they started digging in and found, and they contend that most of this list was made up.
That's according to the lawsuit that JP Morgan filed against Javis, which is separate from this government case. So if I saw something like 1.1% were open, that'd be bad for the Morning Brew newsletter. It's even bad for a company you paid $175 million for. So they started digging in and found, and they contend that most of this list was made up.
And you can't help but point out the similarities between Charlie Javis and some of the other Forbes 30 under 30 who are now in their, quote, hall of shame. And it seems like the people on Javis' team are fully aware of these comparisons that are going on. A spokesperson said the only similarities with Holmes is that they are young, good looking and savvy. That's the only comparison there.
And you can't help but point out the similarities between Charlie Javis and some of the other Forbes 30 under 30 who are now in their, quote, hall of shame. And it seems like the people on Javis' team are fully aware of these comparisons that are going on. A spokesperson said the only similarities with Holmes is that they are young, good looking and savvy. That's the only comparison there.
And you can't help but point out the similarities between Charlie Javis and some of the other Forbes 30 under 30 who are now in their, quote, hall of shame. And it seems like the people on Javis' team are fully aware of these comparisons that are going on. A spokesperson said the only similarities with Holmes is that they are young, good looking and savvy. That's the only comparison there.
This is a case of due diligence. JP Morgan knew what they were getting into, and buyers remorse once they got it.
This is a case of due diligence. JP Morgan knew what they were getting into, and buyers remorse once they got it.
This is a case of due diligence. JP Morgan knew what they were getting into, and buyers remorse once they got it.
So we got a four week trial coming up. Javis has kind of a powerhouse defense team. Ron Sullivan, Harvard Law professor, is her co-counsel. He has a reputation for taking on seemingly impossible cases. He secured an acquittal in a double murder case of Aaron Hernandez. And he also was on Harvey Weinstein's defense team for a bit. So we'll see how this plays out and whether she joins Javis.