Lee Jussim

Right, exactly. It was accepted, but not published. So they ousted him almost immediately. And then the papers, they brought in two special... editors to figure out what to do with the papers accepted as part of the discussion forum. And who were these special editors and what made them special? Well, there was Samin Vazir and E.J. Wagenmacher.

Right, exactly. It was accepted, but not published. So they ousted him almost immediately. And then the papers, they brought in two special... editors to figure out what to do with the papers accepted as part of the discussion forum. And who were these special editors and what made them special? Well, there was Samin Vazir and E.J. Wagenmacher.

Right, exactly. It was accepted, but not published. So they ousted him almost immediately. And then the papers, they brought in two special... editors to figure out what to do with the papers accepted as part of the discussion forum. And who were these special editors and what made them special? Well, there was Samin Vazir and E.J. Wagenmacher.

And both of them, I think Samin is now the head editor at Psychological Science. So they both have had long careers advocating with some success for upgrading the and credibility and rigor of psychological science. They both have made important contributions that way. And so I think that's why they were brought in. They had a certain cachet as able to figure out what to do.

And both of them, I think Samin is now the head editor at Psychological Science. So they both have had long careers advocating with some success for upgrading the and credibility and rigor of psychological science. They both have made important contributions that way. And so I think that's why they were brought in. They had a certain cachet as able to figure out what to do.

And both of them, I think Samin is now the head editor at Psychological Science. So they both have had long careers advocating with some success for upgrading the and credibility and rigor of psychological science. They both have made important contributions that way. And so I think that's why they were brought in. They had a certain cachet as able to figure out what to do.

I think that's what the APS directory believed.

I think that's what the APS directory believed.

I think that's what the APS directory believed.

Like, from their perspective— Are you willing to speculate? Well, so, sure. The main object of Hummel's critique was a— black or biracial social psychologist at Stanford, Stephen Roberts. And Roberts denounced the whole process as racist. Publicly. Okay, okay. Publicly. And I do think that... On what grounds?

Like, from their perspective— Are you willing to speculate? Well, so, sure. The main object of Hummel's critique was a— black or biracial social psychologist at Stanford, Stephen Roberts. And Roberts denounced the whole process as racist. Publicly. Okay, okay. Publicly. And I do think that... On what grounds?

Like, from their perspective— Are you willing to speculate? Well, so, sure. The main object of Hummel's critique was a— black or biracial social psychologist at Stanford, Stephen Roberts. And Roberts denounced the whole process as racist. Publicly. Okay, okay. Publicly. And I do think that... On what grounds?

He probably had three main grounds. Yeah. That was one of them. Absolutely. You know, you criticize this. This shows that you're racist. Racism is pervasive throughout psychology. Right. That would be one ground. Second ground was my use of this, me comparing blacks to mules with, you know, there was a time he sold him a horse and delivered a mule.

He probably had three main grounds. Yeah. That was one of them. Absolutely. You know, you criticize this. This shows that you're racist. Racism is pervasive throughout psychology. Right. That would be one ground. Second ground was my use of this, me comparing blacks to mules with, you know, there was a time he sold him a horse and delivered a mule.

He probably had three main grounds. Yeah. That was one of them. Absolutely. You know, you criticize this. This shows that you're racist. Racism is pervasive throughout psychology. Right. That would be one ground. Second ground was my use of this, me comparing blacks to mules with, you know, there was a time he sold him a horse and delivered a mule.

And then the third was, there was a considerable, so Fiedler offered- Kind of missing the point of that. I know, yeah, right. Fiedler offered Roberts the opportunity to respond to the full set of papers, which were supporting, were generally supporting Hamel's critique of, which was really about diversity in general, but its jumping-off point was a prior paper by Roberts. Okay, got it.

And then the third was, there was a considerable, so Fiedler offered- Kind of missing the point of that. I know, yeah, right. Fiedler offered Roberts the opportunity to respond to the full set of papers, which were supporting, were generally supporting Hamel's critique of, which was really about diversity in general, but its jumping-off point was a prior paper by Roberts. Okay, got it.

And then the third was, there was a considerable, so Fiedler offered- Kind of missing the point of that. I know, yeah, right. Fiedler offered Roberts the opportunity to respond to the full set of papers, which were supporting, were generally supporting Hamel's critique of, which was really about diversity in general, but its jumping-off point was a prior paper by Roberts. Okay, got it.

But it gave Roberts a chance to reply to the critiques. But there was a considerable back-and-forth between Roberts and Fiedler about whether, when, and how to publish Roberts' response. Okay. That... Feedlow was probably kind of a pain in the ass.

But it gave Roberts a chance to reply to the critiques. But there was a considerable back-and-forth between Roberts and Fiedler about whether, when, and how to publish Roberts' response. Okay. That... Feedlow was probably kind of a pain in the ass.