Lee Jussim

from Fiddler on the Roof, there was a time he sold him a horse but delivered a mule, as a frame for progressive disingenuousness around diversity, I was comparing black people to mules.

So this is very new. Actually, part of this backstory is very interesting. The editor of the journal at the time is a European psychologist named Klaus Fiedler. Klaus Fiedler is very accomplished. He's an unbelievably honest. Hundreds of journal articles, multiple editorships and awards published. He was the editor overseeing all this.

So this is very new. Actually, part of this backstory is very interesting. The editor of the journal at the time is a European psychologist named Klaus Fiedler. Klaus Fiedler is very accomplished. He's an unbelievably honest. Hundreds of journal articles, multiple editorships and awards published. He was the editor overseeing all this.

So this is very new. Actually, part of this backstory is very interesting. The editor of the journal at the time is a European psychologist named Klaus Fiedler. Klaus Fiedler is very accomplished. He's an unbelievably honest. Hundreds of journal articles, multiple editorships and awards published. He was the editor overseeing all this.

And my and the other commentaries that he eventually accepted started out as simple reviews. So when Hamel submitted his paper, it was subjected to peer review. I was one of the peer reviewers. Oh, yeah. So was one of the other. Fiedler so liked the reviews that he asked all of us to scale them up to full-length articles.

And my and the other commentaries that he eventually accepted started out as simple reviews. So when Hamel submitted his paper, it was subjected to peer review. I was one of the peer reviewers. Oh, yeah. So was one of the other. Fiedler so liked the reviews that he asked all of us to scale them up to full-length articles.

And my and the other commentaries that he eventually accepted started out as simple reviews. So when Hamel submitted his paper, it was subjected to peer review. I was one of the peer reviewers. Oh, yeah. So was one of the other. Fiedler so liked the reviews that he asked all of us to scale them up to full-length articles.

But I warned Fiedler, the editor, in my review before...

But I warned Fiedler, the editor, in my review before...

But I warned Fiedler, the editor, in my review before...

anyone had the idea that a version of my review would get published, that if he accepted Hamel's critique of the way in which psychologists write and think about diversity, what they've been advocating with respect to diversity, that he would be at heightened risk of people coming after him, demanding the papers be retracted, and coming after his job. This is in my review.

anyone had the idea that a version of my review would get published, that if he accepted Hamel's critique of the way in which psychologists write and think about diversity, what they've been advocating with respect to diversity, that he would be at heightened risk of people coming after him, demanding the papers be retracted, and coming after his job. This is in my review.

anyone had the idea that a version of my review would get published, that if he accepted Hamel's critique of the way in which psychologists write and think about diversity, what they've been advocating with respect to diversity, that he would be at heightened risk of people coming after him, demanding the papers be retracted, and coming after his job. This is in my review.

I'd have to go back. I think I may have taken it out because it wasn't really appropriate because the commentary wasn't... It was about the exchange. It wasn't a message to the editor. Fine. I mean, it's not necessarily the case that it would stick. Yeah. So, Firestorm... APS, the executive director or committee of APS, whatever that group is, of committee, put an immediate kibosh on this.

I'd have to go back. I think I may have taken it out because it wasn't really appropriate because the commentary wasn't... It was about the exchange. It wasn't a message to the editor. Fine. I mean, it's not necessarily the case that it would stick. Yeah. So, Firestorm... APS, the executive director or committee of APS, whatever that group is, of committee, put an immediate kibosh on this.

I'd have to go back. I think I may have taken it out because it wasn't really appropriate because the commentary wasn't... It was about the exchange. It wasn't a message to the editor. Fine. I mean, it's not necessarily the case that it would stick. Yeah. So, Firestorm... APS, the executive director or committee of APS, whatever that group is, of committee, put an immediate kibosh on this.

It was going to be all published as a... As a discussion forum. That's how Fiedler framed it, as a discussion forum about diversity issues. They put an immediate halt. Okay, who's they? It's the officers of the Association for Psychological Science.

It was going to be all published as a... As a discussion forum. That's how Fiedler framed it, as a discussion forum about diversity issues. They put an immediate halt. Okay, who's they? It's the officers of the Association for Psychological Science.

It was going to be all published as a... As a discussion forum. That's how Fiedler framed it, as a discussion forum about diversity issues. They put an immediate halt. Okay, who's they? It's the officers of the Association for Psychological Science.

No, they don't. And shouldn't. And shouldn't, right. But the editor is, to some extent, beholden. I mean, that's who he's working for.