Lee Jussim

It's not focused entirely on any subset of the population. That would be a very simple example of Hummel's point. I was asked to do a commentary I did.

It's not focused entirely on any subset of the population. That would be a very simple example of Hummel's point. I was asked to do a commentary I did.

It's not focused entirely on any subset of the population. That would be a very simple example of Hummel's point. I was asked to do a commentary I did.

Completely different. Completely different. That was part of Hummel's critique. But I guess, again, the editor invited me to publish a commentary on this exchange and The title of my commentary was, is, it eventually got published, is Diversity is Diverse. Because there's lots of different kinds of diversity.

Completely different. Completely different. That was part of Hummel's critique. But I guess, again, the editor invited me to publish a commentary on this exchange and The title of my commentary was, is, it eventually got published, is Diversity is Diverse. Because there's lots of different kinds of diversity.

Completely different. Completely different. That was part of Hummel's critique. But I guess, again, the editor invited me to publish a commentary on this exchange and The title of my commentary was, is, it eventually got published, is Diversity is Diverse. Because there's lots of different kinds of diversity.

And if we're arguing for diversity on scientific grounds, then what the science needs to be is fully representative of the, whether it's the participants or the topics, or it goes way beyond diversity. I mean, repression is a part of that and shouldn't be excluded, but it's only one piece of that. So I basically was in agreement with Hamel's critique and augmented it. As part of that, I critiqued

And if we're arguing for diversity on scientific grounds, then what the science needs to be is fully representative of the, whether it's the participants or the topics, or it goes way beyond diversity. I mean, repression is a part of that and shouldn't be excluded, but it's only one piece of that. So I basically was in agreement with Hamel's critique and augmented it. As part of that, I critiqued

And if we're arguing for diversity on scientific grounds, then what the science needs to be is fully representative of the, whether it's the participants or the topics, or it goes way beyond diversity. I mean, repression is a part of that and shouldn't be excluded, but it's only one piece of that. So I basically was in agreement with Hamel's critique and augmented it. As part of that, I critiqued

progressive academic rhetoric around diversity as disingenuous and hypocritical. And the way I framed that, the way I captured it, was using a quote from Fiddler on the Roof. So in Fiddler on the Roof, which is what, early 20th century Jewish life in the

progressive academic rhetoric around diversity as disingenuous and hypocritical. And the way I framed that, the way I captured it, was using a quote from Fiddler on the Roof. So in Fiddler on the Roof, which is what, early 20th century Jewish life in the

progressive academic rhetoric around diversity as disingenuous and hypocritical. And the way I framed that, the way I captured it, was using a quote from Fiddler on the Roof. So in Fiddler on the Roof, which is what, early 20th century Jewish life in the

Everyone should watch it. Probably its most famous song is Tradition, which is about the importance of tradition and keeping the community together. But then there were exceptions. So there's an interlude in the song Tradition where the villagers get into an argument because one chimes in, there was a time he sold him a horse but delivered a mule.

Everyone should watch it. Probably its most famous song is Tradition, which is about the importance of tradition and keeping the community together. But then there were exceptions. So there's an interlude in the song Tradition where the villagers get into an argument because one chimes in, there was a time he sold him a horse but delivered a mule.

Everyone should watch it. Probably its most famous song is Tradition, which is about the importance of tradition and keeping the community together. But then there were exceptions. So there's an interlude in the song Tradition where the villagers get into an argument because one chimes in, there was a time he sold him a horse but delivered a mule.

And I use that to frame my discussion of progressive disingenuousness. They all disintegrate into fractious arguments in the middle of this song about unity when that comes up. When that comes up, that's right. Yeah, yeah. That's right.

And I use that to frame my discussion of progressive disingenuousness. They all disintegrate into fractious arguments in the middle of this song about unity when that comes up. When that comes up, that's right. Yeah, yeah. That's right.

And I use that to frame my discussion of progressive disingenuousness. They all disintegrate into fractious arguments in the middle of this song about unity when that comes up. When that comes up, that's right. Yeah, yeah. That's right.

And I argued in this paper that the way and the reason that's a good metaphor for progressive rhetoric around diversity is that diversity sound, you know, superficially, it sounds good to a lot of people, right? Because who doesn't want to be included? No matter what group you're a member of, the idea that someone is advocating for diversity, you know, it's kind of appealing. And

And I argued in this paper that the way and the reason that's a good metaphor for progressive rhetoric around diversity is that diversity sound, you know, superficially, it sounds good to a lot of people, right? Because who doesn't want to be included? No matter what group you're a member of, the idea that someone is advocating for diversity, you know, it's kind of appealing. And