Janna Levin

It's just, again, there's not enough of it. It's not the right mass to be the dark matter that makes up this missing component.

It's just, again, there's not enough of it. It's not the right mass to be the dark matter that makes up this missing component.

Wow. Well, good for them.

Wow. Well, good for them.

Wow. Well, good for them.

Really? That's fascinating. Did somebody film that? That would be a great documentary.

Really? That's fascinating. Did somebody film that? That would be a great documentary.

Really? That's fascinating. Did somebody film that? That would be a great documentary.

Yeah, and why do they want to believe a thing? What's very interesting is trying to use rational arguments. That makes it even more confounding to me. I would understand more somebody who just said, look, I have faith and I believe these things and it's not about reason and it's not about logic. Okay. I mean, I don't relate to it, but okay. But to say I'm going to use reason and logic

Yeah, and why do they want to believe a thing? What's very interesting is trying to use rational arguments. That makes it even more confounding to me. I would understand more somebody who just said, look, I have faith and I believe these things and it's not about reason and it's not about logic. Okay. I mean, I don't relate to it, but okay. But to say I'm going to use reason and logic

Yeah, and why do they want to believe a thing? What's very interesting is trying to use rational arguments. That makes it even more confounding to me. I would understand more somebody who just said, look, I have faith and I believe these things and it's not about reason and it's not about logic. Okay. I mean, I don't relate to it, but okay. But to say I'm going to use reason and logic

And to prove to you this completely orthogonal conclusion, that I find really interesting. So there's some kind of romance about reason and logic?

And to prove to you this completely orthogonal conclusion, that I find really interesting. So there's some kind of romance about reason and logic?

And to prove to you this completely orthogonal conclusion, that I find really interesting. So there's some kind of romance about reason and logic?

Well, I mean, I actually appreciate the skeptic's stance. I don't... Scientists also have to be skeptics. We have to be childlike, naive, and somewhat, in some sense, really open to anything. Right? Otherwise, you're not going to be a flexible. You're not going to be at the forefront. But... but also to be skeptical. So I have respect for it.

Well, I mean, I actually appreciate the skeptic's stance. I don't... Scientists also have to be skeptics. We have to be childlike, naive, and somewhat, in some sense, really open to anything. Right? Otherwise, you're not going to be a flexible. You're not going to be at the forefront. But... but also to be skeptical. So I have respect for it.

Well, I mean, I actually appreciate the skeptic's stance. I don't... Scientists also have to be skeptics. We have to be childlike, naive, and somewhat, in some sense, really open to anything. Right? Otherwise, you're not going to be a flexible. You're not going to be at the forefront. But... but also to be skeptical. So I have respect for it.

I guess that's exactly what I'm saying is more confusing because to invoke skepticism and then to want to use rational argument, what is the other component that's going into this? Because as you said, this is something that's easily verified. I mean, we have people in space. So you have to believe a lot more machinery arguments That's a lot more difficult to justify, explain as a wild conspiracy.

I guess that's exactly what I'm saying is more confusing because to invoke skepticism and then to want to use rational argument, what is the other component that's going into this? Because as you said, this is something that's easily verified. I mean, we have people in space. So you have to believe a lot more machinery arguments That's a lot more difficult to justify, explain as a wild conspiracy.

I guess that's exactly what I'm saying is more confusing because to invoke skepticism and then to want to use rational argument, what is the other component that's going into this? Because as you said, this is something that's easily verified. I mean, we have people in space. So you have to believe a lot more machinery arguments That's a lot more difficult to justify, explain as a wild conspiracy.