Elie Mystal
Appearances
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Well, first of all, we don't have same-day registration in New York, right? You have to register at least 10 days before the election to participate in an election in New York. And while 10 days might not seem like a lot of time if you are a politically active person who listens to things like Fresh Air, but if you're a nonpolitical person who is right now listening to ESPN –
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Being able to register to vote on the same day you actually go to vote for the election is kind of really convenient, right? But New York doesn't have same-day registration on Election Day. New York has nothing involving what's called portability, and that is critical for... For a market like New York. So portability means I'm registered in one county and then I move.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Does my registration follow me or do I have to re-register in the new county that I move to? And in New York, there is no portability. So you constantly have to re-register every time you change counties. But think about how...
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
damning that is in a place like New York City, where if you move from Manhattan to Brooklyn, as many people do as they have children, if you move from Manhattan to Westchester, as I did when I realized that my kid couldn't live in a shoebox, you have to re-register when you move to Brooklyn or when you move to Westchester or when you move to Long Island.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
There are many laws that we have that are dumb but inconsequential, right? And there are many laws that we have that are dumb but really complicated, right? And require not repeal but reform, require updates, require massaging, right? The laws that I focused on in my book are both consequential but
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Well, I like to think of it this way. The high watermark for voter participation in this country happened before we had voter registration, right? We had 80, almost 90 percent turnout before voter registration laws attacked the country. There are a couple of other stories about that. There are a couple of other reasons for that.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
We're a bigger country now than we were in the 1800s, yada, yada, yada. But I believe strongly that if we just had a voter eligibility requirement and everybody who was eligible to vote was automatically registered to vote, we would see participation shoot on up in this country and voter participation, not just for presidential elections.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
But for all the other elections all the way down the ballot, for the off-year elections, the congressional midterms, for state and local elections, people think about re-registering around the four-year presidential election cycle. People often don't even know when their local elections are taking place.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
But if everybody was preregistered, if everybody was – everybody who was eligible was automatically registered, then you could literally say, hey, Jim, it's Tuesday. We got to go vote today. Really? What? I didn't know we had an election day. Yeah, we do, Jim. Let's go. And we could just go and vote and go home and go back to ESPN.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
That's how – you want to make voting as frictionless as possible if you want to increase participation.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Yeah, Tanya. So behind the curtain here, the inside baseball scoop is that this is the first chapter that I wrote for the book. And I know it sounds weird because airline deregulation, like how is that nearly as important as immigration or voting rights, which we've just discussed. But I really hate flying.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
And because of law school, I had such a strong kind of understanding that the reasons why I hate flying are on purpose. The airlines are doing this on purpose. The laws have been constructed to allow the airlines to make me personally hate flying on purpose. Right. But when I sat down to research it, I like I usually do kind of initially thought, all right, so where are the bad Republicans?
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
but don't need to be reformed, don't need to be massaged, don't need to be updated for the modern age. They're just stupid. And if we just got rid of them, things would be better the day after we got rid of those laws. So that was the kind of fundamental scoping of the book. And that's how I came up with the 10 that I chose to focus on.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Where are the Republicans? How did they do this? Let me explain it. Right. And as I, you know, every kind of new book or a new article, new case I would read, it was just like, oh, there are the Democrats again. Oh, there are some more Democrats. Oh, oh, my goodness. There's all of the Democrats.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
And so it really kind of shaped a lot of the book to really, as I said in the beginning, the scoping of let's think about the popular laws. Let's think about the laws that had broad bipartisan support. And airline deregulation had broad bipartisan support, so broad that its critical sponsor in the Senate was so-called well-known liberal lion Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
And so the entire chapter is kind of explaining how a fundamentally conservative Republican laissez-faire economic theory, deregulation – championed by one of the most racist lawyers and impactfully racist humans in American history, Robert Bork. For those playing along at home, Bork is the guy Nixon found to eventually fire everybody during the Saturday Night Massacre, right? That's Bork.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
How does Bork's ridiculous, untested, unproven conservative deregulation theory capture Ted Kennedy and become the standard operating procedure of the Democratic Party. And my chapter explores how exactly that happened. It was a heist.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Well, you know, I only know about the glory days of airline travels from my father. And I kind of talk about that in the book. But basically – Service was king. Service was king in the old days of airline travel because the airlines couldn't change their prices very much. Prices were fixed by the federal government.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
There was a regulatory agency called the Civil Aeronautics Board, the CAB, which literally had price fixing on airfares. So if you wanted to grow your business as an airline, you couldn't overcharge people. You couldn't undercharge people. You couldn't compete on price. The only way you could compete was on service. And so that's why flying used to be awesome, because service was king.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Well, see, there's... The economists disagree. It was expensive to fly some places, but it was cheaper than it is now to fly some places. But it was cheaper to fly other places, right? And the difference between what was overly expensive and what was fairly priced depended on how popular the route was. Because the point of the price fixing was not just the big bad government stamping down the –
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
businesses and innovation. That wasn't why they were price fixing. They were price fixing to try to encourage airlines to fly to low populated routes.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Right. Well, this is also the problem of neoliberalism, right? It's ceding to the market what should be a government function, but then still having the government there to back up the market every time it fails. And that is a great business if you are one of the deregulated businesses, right?
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Because that means you get to keep all of the profits when things are going well and get bailed out when things are going poorly. The airlines have had massive repeated shocks after 9-11, during COVID. That's just in the past 20 years, right? 25 years. Yet we bail them out. When the airlines are doing great, do they pay us back? Do they give the money back? No, no, no, son, no.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
That's not how it works. That's one of the fundamental flaws of neoliberalism. When you give the market what should be a government function, it's not just that the government then has to bail them out when they go poorly. It's that the government never gets the benefits when they do well. Yeah. And that's the definition of the airline industry.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
And what I try to do in the book is explain that the harm that these laws caused was what was intended by the people who passed them. You know, a lot of times in the book, I will go into the history of how these laws came about in the first place. And you will see people making terrible decisions in real time in support of these statutes and other kind of legal concepts and measures, right?
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
They get all of the profits when things are fine, and we have to pay for them anyway when things go wrong.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Our House of Representatives, right, the House Chamber of Congress, right, which is our most basic federal representative, right? Your individual congressperson is the closest person to the actual people. One congressman in America represents around 750,000 people. I don't remember the exact number. I wrote it down so I didn't have to remember the exact number.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
But it's somewhere in the order of 1 to 700 or so thousand. Right. That's the representative ratio of the country. One representative per 700 or so thousand people. Right. That ratio is the worst ratio of any country that calls itself a democracy in the world.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
And what that means is that in every other single country, one representative represents fewer people than one representative represents here. Our ratio is the worst of any country that calls itself a democracy. That's what I mean when I say that we have the least representative government amongst major democracies. I'm not I don't mean that in terms of feeling.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Well, it didn't always used to be this way, right? We are capped at 435 representatives, right? That's how many people are in the House. Why is that the cap? Is that cap required by the Constitution? No. Did we come up with 435 and we all – no.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
We used to – everybody knows after every census, every 10 years we have a census and we all go through the process of redistricting and we find out that like some states gain representatives and some states lose representatives and we shuffle everybody around. That used to not happen.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
For the first 150 years, whenever there was a new census, instead of moving congressmen around, they just added congressmen. So nobody lost representation. So the ratios remained relatively stable, right? So if California ends up needing five more reps, instead of taking those five reps from New York, you just give California five more reps. Boom, problem solved. We did that until the 1920s.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
As with almost every story in this country, black people happened, right? The 1920s saw increasing relevance of people living in cities. Urban people happened, right? And so the 1920 census saw for the first time that real shift from an agricultural rural society to an urban city society, right?
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
And so the redistricting that would have had to happen after the 1920 census would have given a lot more power to states that had large cities in it as opposed to states that were mainly rural or agrarian. And the people who control the government at that point, it was Woodrow Wilson, who was one of the most racist presidents we've ever had.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
The laws that I'm focusing on are functioning as intended, if you will. And their intention was poor. Their intention was bad. Their intention was anti-democratic or racist or, again, or monopolistic.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
They didn't like it so much that they just ignored the 1920 census. We call the night the scholars call the 1920 census the lost census because it's the only census where no redistricting happened whatsoever. They were just like, oh, look at these numbers. Nah, we're not going to do it this time. And they just did not redistrict for an entire 10-year cycle. Over those 10 years...
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
They came up with their plan, and that plan was to cap the number of congressional representatives. So in 1920, we were at 435 congressmen. And as we get to 1930s, as we get the 1930 census, which shows the same things, because it's not like people were moving back to the farm. But by the 1930 census, we have now capped the number of congresspeople at 435 congressmen.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
And so instead of adding representatives to states with large cities, we then just start moving them around between each other. And that is why we're here today, folks.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Right. So I'm saying that we should stop doing that. We should just add more congresspeople, right? And there are various different ways that we can think about adding more congresspeople, various different numbers that we could go for. I like what the scholars call the Wyoming rule, right? Every single state gets at least one representative, no matter how – unpopulated that state is.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Currently, our smallest state by population is Wyoming. Wyoming has around 570,000 people, right? And they get one congressional representative. So let's just use what's called the Wyoming rule. Everybody, every 570,000 people get one representative, right? That should be our ratio, not one to 750 or whatever, one to 570, right? That's what Wyoming gets. That's what everybody should get, right?
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
If you did that, you'd have to add, oh, about 700 congresspeople. And that would be better. Having literally more congresspeople would be a more representative government. Now, Tanya, you mentioned the Electoral College. You always hear, especially liberals, complain about the Electoral College. Look, I don't like it neither.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
But you can't change the Electoral College without a constitutional amendment. You can change the number of congresspeople just by a simple piece of legislation, which, again, we did for about 150 years. If you added 700 congresspeople, do you know what that does to the electoral college? It makes it way, way more representative of the larger states, right?
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
So imagine how many extra congresspeople would end up in California or New York if we went to the Wyoming rule. And by the way, that's not necessarily partisan because the other states that we get a lot more congresspeople are Florida and Texas.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
So it doesn't fix all of the inherent unfairnesses of the Electoral College, but it certainly makes the election for president far more indicative of the number of people who live in this country as opposed to the land that people happen to live on. I promise you, in a world with 700 extra congresspeople, Mike Johnson is not the Speaker of the House.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Indeed it is. It is in opposition to what America is most proud of because I don't think America should be particularly proud of slavery and apartheid. And when you look at the laws that were passed before 1965, what we have is a situation where not everybody who was living here under the laws had a right to have a say in what those laws were. They didn't have a right to vote.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
They didn't have a right to participate in the government, not a full, fair and equal right to participate in the government. And so that is antithetical to the concept of democratic self-government. Now, Tanya, you did slightly misstate my position in the open because I don't say that all of the laws passed before 1965 should be immediately and forever abolished tomorrow.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
That is actually a little bit too extreme even for me. What I am saying is that any law passed before the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which I – have always said is the most important single piece of legislation ever passed in American history because it's the first piece of legislation ever passed in American history that made real the promise of democratic self-government, right?
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Before the 1965 Voting Rights Act, we are functionally an apartheid state. So what I'm saying is that any law passed before the Voting Rights Act should be viewed with constitutional skepticism. Right. So put it like this. If all you got for why this should happen or that shouldn't happen is some law that was passed in 1921. I don't care. I just don't care.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
And I don't think the government should care. I don't think legislators and I don't think judges should care if you've got an additional argument. for why the law is good, well, now we can have a discussion, right? Because I'm not saying that every single law passed before 1965 was facially bad.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Right. But I also think, and this is perhaps me being a little bit naive, I also think that the laws that were passed before the Voting Rights Act, the laws that were passed before we had full, fair, and equal participation in government from all Americans, the laws that were passed before that, that we like, that we think are good, we could probably pass those again. At least we could try. Right.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
So if you think that you have this law from 1921 that's still really good and really relevant and really important for the modern age, why don't you pass it again, this time asking everybody, not just rich white men. Let's ask everybody if we think that law is still good. And if so, and some of them will be, then let's go.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Yeah, so one provision of the INA of 1921 was that the Secretary of State, on their sole discretion, can revoke the legal permanent status of immigrants, so green card holders and work visa holders, other legal permanent residents, that the Secretary of State can revoke
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
these legal documents on their say-so if they feel that that immigrant's activities contradict some fundamental foreign interest of the United States. There's no hearing. There's no jury. There's no trial. There's just the say-so of the Secretary of State. That is dumb. That is anti-democratic. That should be unconstitutional.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
And the only reason why the government has any argument to hold, I believe, illegally hold, abduct, and threaten to deport a legal green card holder like Khalil, who committed no crime. Because remember, Khalil has not been charged with any crime. because he didn't commit any crimes.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
I would love to get to that heart of the case. But even before we get to that key First Amendment question, the fundamental hook that the government is using to hold Khalil is this determination by Rubio, by the Secretary of State of the United States, who is currently Marco Rubio, that Khalil was engaged in anti-American activities, that the government even has a hook to revoke his green card.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
And that statute, that line, that hook... comes from the 1921 Immigration Nationality Act. To me, it is a perfect example of why these old, disgusting, racist laws should be repealed forthwith and on their face, because it is these kinds of metastasizations of the racism of the past that hound us and haunt us even in our present and our future.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Yep. So the INA comes from a long congressional process. And one of the chief advocates for the INA and for the restrictions on immigration, specifically for immigrants from the global south, was based on the science and testimony of a guy, Laughlin.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Laughlin would later go on to receive a medal from the then Nazi-controlled University of Heidelberg for his important scientific contributions to the theory of eugenics. When I say that America exported Nazi eugenics to the Nazis, I'm not being hyperbolic. This guy, Laughlin, this is the guy that essentially told Hitler how to make eugenics work as a scientific proposition.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
And it's this guy and his science that the U.S. Congress relied upon while writing the initial INA. This guy was giving congressional testimony in those congressional testimonies.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Congressman, congressmen from both political parties, by the way, were saying how important the testimony is and how important it was to write an immigration law that would protect the white race in America from mongrelization. By the weaker and inferior races.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
That's literally in the congressional record in support of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which is currently being used to hold Mahmoud Khalil illegally. It is one linear story. And that story is steeped in literal Nazi eugenics.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Every single one, right? So look, voter eligibility requirements are one thing, right? Voter eligibility requirements are things like you have to be 18 and you have to live in the state that you vote in and all these kinds of rules and regulations. And I can argue that some of the eligibility requirements are bad or wrong. But again, the scoping of the book, what can we repeal?
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
I don't think that we can repeal voting. voter eligibility requirements. We need to have some of them, even if some of them are ones that I wouldn't agree with or like. Voter registration, on the other hand, is completely useless. Once we have established the rules for eligibility, everybody who is eligible should be automatically registered to vote. And that is not just me saying that.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
That is most of the democratic world saying that. America is unique in its double hurdles to voting, right? We call ourselves the greatest democracy in the world. We are not. We are not in the top 10 because other countries have universal freedoms. Most other countries have some form of universal registration so that if you are eligible to vote, you are automatically then registered to vote.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
That was the most difficult part of writing this book because, as you can imagine, there are a lot of laws. Many of them are stupid, and I did not read them all. So trying to scope how to pick just 10 was the initial challenge of the book. And where I landed on was trying to focus on laws that could be stricken today and and have life be better tomorrow, right?
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
You don't have to go through a two-step process. Hey, I'm eligible. And now also I'm registered. That is insane. And that is straight up anti-democratic.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Right. So first of all, registration was not endemic to the founding of this country. Right. Whatever you think about James Madison and Thomas Jefferson and them, they weren't running around requiring pre-election registration for eligible voters. Now, obviously, I disagree strongly with Thomas Jefferson's eligibility requirements.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
But for the 15 rich white men Thomas Jefferson thought should be eligible to vote, they didn't have to register to vote. Voter registration really only became a thing in America after the Civil War. And it really only became a thing in America after the Civil War in the North because you had this exodus of newly freed black people migrating to the North.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
You had this influx of immigrants from across the pond migrating to the North to places like New York. Specifically to places like New York City. So all of a sudden, New York State fearing the black and Irish swelling of New York City and how that would overwhelm and overrun upstate voters. That's when you get the first real voter registration requirements in the Northeast.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
specifically in New York City. Laws that are designed to make it harder for migrating Black folks and new immigrants into New York City who are eligible to vote to register to vote.
Fresh Air
A Legal Scholar On 10 Laws 'Ruining America'
Because that suppresses the vote of New York City and maintains the superiority of suburban – it wasn't suburban at that point – rural upstate and Long Island voters to still keep control of New York State as a polity. That's where they come from.
The Charlie Kirk Show
It's Liberation Day! + The Wisconsin Aftermath
Every law passed before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be presumptively unconstitutional, right? Because before the 1965 Voting Rights Act, we were functionally an apartheid country. Not everybody who lived here could vote here. So why should I give a... about some law that some old white man passed in the 1920s.
The Charlie Kirk Show
It's Liberation Day! + The Wisconsin Aftermath
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
My name is real, my hair is real, it's Haitian. And I feel like Miami listeners are gonna have met quite a few Ellies. It's a fairly common Haitian name, but a lot of people think that I'm named after a girl. So, like, whatever. You just... You roll with what you got.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Yeah, it sounds like a drink. Nah, it's more sac-passe. It's just Creole, man. That's... Das ist alles, was das ist.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Schau, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich, ich
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
And I hate saying this like very, very much Donald Trump's tweet, Donald Trump's tweet talking about how all these people were idiots for Nadja. And, you know, of course, Trump had to do it in the most like eugenics way possible. Right. He's got good genes. Right. He's got he's got superior genes. Like that's how he had to do it, because that's the way that that fascist man thinks. But.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Bottom line, Jimmy Haslam, right, the owner of the Browns, he's a big GOP donor. My friend Joe Patrice on Above the Law, we were talking about this last night. He's a huge GOP donor. If you look at that footage of Barry being forced to draft him, it seemed pretty clear that that wasn't his call, right?
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
It seems pretty clear that he got a call from the owner saying, draft that kid after they had gotten there. super tollen 5'9-Quartier aus Oregon. Es scheint, als hätte Jimmy Haslam seinen GM übergezockt und ihn zu diesem Pick gemacht. Und ich kann mir nicht helfen zu denken, dass das etwas damit zu tun hat, dass Trump mit seinen tollen Genen rauskommt und etwas darüber sagt.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Selbst am Morgen, als ich das White House Press Briefing gesehen habe, war ihre Gesichter... Nicht Kayleigh, die neue Kayleigh war da draußen und sprach darüber, dass sie nur sagen kann, dass Trump darüber gedreht hat, und dann wurde er verabschiedet. Das ist die White-House-Spin auf das.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Und Jimmy Haslam ist ein großer GOP-Donor, also kann ich nicht sagen, dass das nichts damit zu tun hatte, dass er den Fall verabschiedet hat und wo er tatsächlich aufgetreten ist.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Until I say it, it hasn't been said. Me maximum. Me maximum. Me maximum. This is the Dan Levatar Show with the Stugats.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Do we know if he meant number like... Hey, what's Lawrence Taylor's number? I'd like to talk to him.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Exactly. Two steps behind means when he falls, you can't catch him, but you can go like, oh no, you can do the fake hustle of, oh, almost, almost.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Das blaue 56, Mann, das ist unabhängig. Das ist unabhängig. Du musst noch ein anderes Shirt wählen. Vielleicht Manning?
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Dan, I've got another famous NFL number. I can only think of one guy. I won't even tell you who the guy is. I'll just tell you the number. Seven. Oh, wow. Wow. Two Americas. Mike Vick. Ich dachte, klar Mike Vick.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Nummer 23 aus North Carolina!
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
First of all, it wasn't the starters, because Jackson Hayes started, subbed out after four minutes and never came back in. Like Judy from Family Matters. Went upstairs, never came back downstairs. Right? Es ist absolut ein fairer Kritik, fünf Jungs 24 Minuten lang zu spielen, ohne irgendeinen Ausdruck zu haben. Und auch einer von ihnen ist 40 Jahre alt. Das ist unkonsensibel.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Ist es okay, Julius Randall und Anthony Edwards zu tun? Sie sind jung. Sie sind jung, du kannst es mit ihnen machen, du kannst es nicht machen, besonders mit dem Lack der Depth, den die Lakers haben. Und das ist Teil des Testmatches. Klar, wir wollen alle mit Schmerzen und Fatigue spielen und meine besten fünf Spieler spielen und es wie ein Videospiel machen. Aber das ist nicht der Job, richtig?
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Ja, nein, ich muss zuerst als Giants-Fan beginnen. Das ist das, was mein Team macht. Und wenn die Giants wissen wollen, wie gut ein Quarterback sein kann, wenn sie einen lauten Vater haben, der den Draft manipuliert, müssen sie nicht weiter als Eli Manning schauen. Denn es gibt nichts, was Deion Sanders tut, was er nicht gelernt hat, von Archie Manning zu sehen.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Steve Kerr findet einen Weg, Guy Santos zu spielen. Du musst deinen Guy Santos finden. Er sollte nicht auf dem Papier spielen. Ja, ich werde ihm nicht in einem Playoff-Spiel vertrauen. Aber...
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Ich habe durch das Jahr genug gemacht, um ihn zu entwickeln und ihm die Aufmerksamkeit zu geben, dass wenn der Zeit kommt, in der ich stehlen muss, ich stehle Minuten für Curry, für Jimmy Butler, wer auch immer, es ist das gleiche hier. Vielleicht sogar mehr so, weil LeBron 40 Jahre alt ist. Du musst Minuten finden. Und das, was ich nicht mag, das ist, was er gesagt hat, aber J.J.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
wurde gefragt, er sagte, ich habe die Jungs am Anfang der Vierten gefragt, wie sie sich fühlen, und sie haben alle gesagt, sie fühlen sich gut. Also musste ich ihnen vertrauen. Natürlich sagen sie das! Wer stellt sich die Hände und sagt, ich bin müde? Niemand macht das! Du musst also der Bösewicht sein und sagen, ich muss es dir stehlen!
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Manchmal machen die Jungs das Ende der dritten Runde, Anfang der vierten Runde. Und dann haben wir eine Viertelrunde, wo wir den Rest auslösen. Aber du bist voll zwölf in der dritten und voll zwölf in der vierten Runde. Natürlich wird es so passieren. Und wenn man sich die Serie anschaut, haben die Wolves die Lakers im vierten Quartal sehr ausgespielt.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Und das muss man tun, weil die Lakers aus dem Gas laufen. Was ich übrigens gesagt habe, als der Luka Doncic-Trade stattfand. Ich habe gesagt, das ist ein toller Trade. L.A., Glückwunsch! Dieses Jahr verwendet er es einfach nur, um zu spielen. Nächstes Jahr wird es großartig sein, wenn er sein Team fixieren kann und seine Fähigkeiten befestigen kann.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Und alle sagen, oh nein, der Laker geht jetzt raus. Was redest du da? Sie haben keine Bigs. Sie haben keine Tiefe. Ich verstehe, Luca ist großartig, LeBron ist großartig. Du denkst, du kannst einfach rauslaufen in einem Playoff-Szenario und ihre Großartigkeit wird jeden anderen Vorteil auslösen? Aber hier sind wir.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Dan, what you just basically told me is I could go do cartwheels. in der Mitte von Biscayne Boulevard und nicht von einem Auto verletzt werden. Ich bin großartig, wenn ich Kartbühnen über Biscayne Boulevard mache. Nein, das bedeutet, dass es damals funktioniert hat. Also, wenn sie das Spiel gewonnen haben, weil sie hoch waren, könntest du sagen, oh, was, sieh, wir haben nichts falsch gemacht.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Aber der Prozess ist falsch. Wir wissen, dass der Prozess falsch ist. Der Resultat ist der Resultat. Ich denke, der Bench ist falsch. Mehr als der Prozess. Das ist, was wir sagen. Der Prozess ist, weil der Bench. Und weil sie nicht die Dämpfe haben,
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Er hat das Gefühl, dass er das tun muss, aber dann, auch wenn du das tun wirst, auch wenn du die Dämpfe nicht hast, musst du einen Weg finden, um ein paar Minuten für sie zu verlieren. Ein paar Reste hier oder da. Vielleicht ist LeBron da und Luca ist da. Vielleicht ist Luca da und LeBron ist da. Vielleicht sind sie beide da.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Was auch immer es ist, du musst jemanden auf dem Platz finden, den du schauen kannst. Maybe someone like Gabe Vincent. Just give them a couple of minutes in there. Because otherwise what you're doing is you're putting an immense pressure of perfection on them.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
People forget that Archie Manning literally would not let Eli play for the San Diego Chargers. The Giants are like, oh no, that's a locker room cancer waiting to happen. No, they were like, come, come, come, come on over. We're going to put you on our team. Tom Brady wishes the Giants had reacted to Eli Manning the way that they reacted to Shader Sanders, right?
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
2010, Western Conference Finals, Game 5, Los Angeles Lakers vs. Phoenix Suns. The Suns make a huge comeback, capped by a Jason Richardson Bankshot 3. We've got all the momentum. They call timeout. We know where it's going. There are no illusions who's going to get the ball, and there are no illusions as to what he's going to do when he gets the ball. Kobe Bryant catches it on the right sideline.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
We aggressively trap the shit out of him. so aggressiv, dass er den Schuss an den Ball schießt. Wenn er den Ball an den Ring schießt, wenn er den Ball an die Rückseite schießt, dann geht der Ball raus. In der Zwischenzeit gewinnen wir wahrscheinlich das Spiel, richtig? Anstattdessen ist es ein Ball, der direkt unter den Ring wartet.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Ron Artest schießt ihn, legt ihn hoch, und dann ist das Spiel vorbei. Das ist so, wie es passiert. Manchmal, und du willst das Wort Gravität im Basketball kennen? Das ist Gravität. Die Respektniveau ist so hoch, dass wir alles komplett verkaufen werden, um sicherzustellen, dass du uns nicht schaffst. Aber in diesem Prozess verletzt du dann jemanden, der nur rumschlägt.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Aaron Gordon, und ich habe mit meinem Kind darüber gesprochen, Viele sagen, Aaron Gordon ist 6'9 und hat einen 40-Inch-Vertical. Ja, aber das ist nicht das, was ihn gemacht hat. Er hat den richtigen Platz und den richtigen Zeitpunkt, weil er es vorgesehen hat. Er hat es visualisiert. Er hat gesagt, wenn dieser Ball kurz kommt, werde ich bereit sein.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Because he'd have two extra rings right now. It is pathetic. And the thing that I really... Again, as a fan first. Brian Dayball is out here talking about how, oh, Shader Sanders, I didn't like how he reacted to our installation package. Brother, you three and fourteen, maybe your installation package sucks. Like, has that occurred to you yet?
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Und das, meine Damen und Herren, das ist das, was Veteranen spielen. Das ist das, was championship-winninges Basketball ist. Das sind die Jungs, die das Spiel denken, bevor es passiert, nicht versuchen, nachdem es passiert.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Rockets vs. Lakers, 1983, I want to say, 82, 83. That's a recall right there.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Wenn der Ball in den Hupen geraten ist, ist es egal, ob seine Hand drauf ist. Es ist so, dass er in den Hupen geraten ist.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Aber es ist durch den Hoop gegangen. Das ist, warum es zählt. Jetzt, wenn er über den Ring gewesen wäre? Nein. Aber weil der Ball in den Hoop gekommen ist, ist es egal, ob er da ist. In einer exagerierten Weise. Stell dir vor, du hättest seinen ganzen Arm und Bein da drin.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Dann, you know what my favorite thing is? I went to game three, the one that the Clippers won, and that building, ist so phänomenal, was die Atmosphäre betrifft. Ich war da vor einem Jahr und dachte mir, das ist schrecklich. Es ist ein wunderschönes Gebäude, aber die Jungs waren nicht so gut. Spiel drei, die Jungs waren verrückt.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Und ich habe Regret, dass ich nicht für Spiel vier da war, weil ich wollte wissen, was die Reaktion von allen war, die sich umgekippt haben.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Hands in your pockets.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Like, look, if Chuck Schumer, in my world, if Chuck Schumer is gonna like draft me to run for Congress and he gives me the Democratic playbook right now, I'm gonna be like, nah, Chuck, that ain't it. Because all y'all do is lose. Maybe I got my own plays that I want to run, Chuck. And that's just in my world.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
The idea that you can't draft a quarterback because you didn't like how he reacted to your 3-14 installation package is just... Es ist außerhalb von mir. Also ja, als Giant-Fan zuerst, was für ein Verrückter. Als afroamerikanischer Männer, schau, niemand macht Blödsinn-Racismus ganz wie die NFL, richtig?
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Weißt du, wie wir gerade viele Leute darüber reden, ich kann nicht glauben, dass diese Latinos für Trump wählen. Wissen sie nicht, dass sie sich deportieren werden? Und ich bin so, Bruder, wir sehen die NFL, wir können nicht sprechen. We can't talk to no Latino who voted for Trump because we watch the NFL. The league does this. The league plays in our faces like this all the time.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
And Sanders is just the most recent, most blatant example. And I know some of your listeners are going to be like, how can you tell it's racist? Because look, there are two kinds of racism, right? There's the racism that only happens because you're black. Und Menschen, die nicht glauben, dass Rassismus existiert, lieben es, darüber zu sprechen.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Denn sobald sie einen schwarzen Mann finden, den es nicht passiert, werden sie sagen, sieh, Rassismus ist alles Barack Obama. Was hast du da? Wie, du weißt, Scoreboard, Barack Obama. Aber es gibt einen anderen Art von Rassismus. Und das ist Rassismus, der nie zu weißen Leuten passiert.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Und du siehst nie, du siehst nie einen weißen Athleten-Talent, der wie ein Stein im Draft fällt, weil sie nicht gut interviewt haben, richtig? Nick Bosa hier interviewt, als wäre er ein Januar 6 Terrorist. Das beeinflusst ihn nicht, richtig? Johnny Manziel hier interviewt, als wäre er Nick Cage von Leaving Las Vegas. Das beeinflusst ihn nicht, richtig? Die Jets, mein Rival-Team.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Sein letzter Verteidiger hat ihn interviewt, als ob er R.F.K.Jr. war. Hatte in drei Jahren kein Schlafzimmer. Hatte wahrscheinlich Rabies. Wird ihn nicht beeinflussen. Aber, oh, aber Shader Sanders wurde schlecht interviewt, also können wir ihn nicht draften. Sie spielen in unseren Füßen, Mann, aber die NFL macht das immer. Aber Jackson Dart hat einen tollen Namen. Von Ole Miss. Von Ole Miss.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
One of the most ridiculously long-term, literally named their team after the Confederates, Ole Miss. Jackson darts the guy. Again, I'm a Giant fan. Hopefully Jackson does well. I don't want to shade Jackson just because of where he comes from. I'm not like that.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Ich hoffe, dass Jackson es gut macht, aber die Idee, dass du Shader Sanders nicht ausdraften kannst, weil er schlecht interviewt wurde oder weil du nicht magst, wie er mit deinem Installationspaket reagiert hat, das ist wirklich verrückt. Und es werden Leute sein, die es glauben. Es werden Leute sein, die diesen Redaktion kaufen.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Ich meine, ich werde mein Alter ein bisschen zeigen, aber du erinnerst dich, ich weiß, dass ich sehr alt bin, also habe ich mich verarscht, aber erinnerst du dich an den Wunderlich-Test? Ja, ja, ich erinnere mich an das Jahr, in dem Steve McNair in den Draft gedroht wurde, weil er offensichtlich schlecht auf den Wunderlich-Test gearbeitet hat.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Wenn sie an dich kommen wollen, wenn du schwarz bist, werden sie etwas aus dem dünnen Luft ziehen, um Steve McNair zu machen. Deion Sanders, richtig? Lass uns hier klar sein. Das ist keine Levar-Ball-Situation. Das ist keine Situation, in der du einen amerikanischen Geschäftsführer hast, der die Liga auf der Wand hält. Deion Sanders ist in der Hall of Fame.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
I went to Harvard. My kid knows how to do homework. Alright? He knows how to read a book. Das ist ganz einfach. Es gibt keine Chance, dass Shader Sanders nicht weiß, wie er sich für ein NFL-Spiel vorbereiten kann. Mit dieser Art von Aufbringung. Es gibt keine Chance. Also diese Ideen, dass er irgendwie, wiederum nur aufgrund seiner Interviewfähigkeit,
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
is not worthy of being drafted on the first two days of the draft. That is incredible on its face. And yet that's the game they're playing. And that's where I'm saying it's racist. That's where I'm saying, like, this doesn't happen to white folks, right? Baker Mayfield can go on the sidelines, you know, with his hand in his crotch for the entire fourth quarter. Ain't nobody gonna say anything.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
But when it happens to the black guy, now we have all the... Dan, du wirst es besser wissen. Hat Shader Sanders eine Parkplatte? Dieser Junge hat, soweit ich weiß, absolut keine off-field-Issuen. Wir sprechen von einer Liga, in der einige Brüder off-field-Issuen haben. Dieser Junge hat, soweit ich weiß, kein Problem mit Verbrechen. Es gibt kein Video von ihm, dass er Frauen versteckt hat.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Er war nicht bei einem Ditty Party, so weit ich mich erinnern kann. Dieser Kerl hat keine off-field-Issuen. Es geht also alles darum, wer er ist und wer sein Vater ist. Und irgendwie, wenn er schwarz ist, hat er einen berühmten Vater. Und ein ausgesprochener Vater schmerzt ihn überhaupt nicht.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Aber wenn du ein Manning bist, ich schwöre, wenn dieser Mann namens Seamus Manning genannt wurde, anstatt von Shader Sanders, wäre er Nummer drei für die Giants gegangen. Ende der Geschichte.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Ich halte meinen Atem und bin so, okay, lasst uns gehen. Das sollte funktionieren. Es sollte funktionieren. Er sollte gut sein. Ich weiß nicht. Ich kann Quaterbacks nicht evaluieren. Ich bin nicht Mel Kuyper. Aber basierend auf der Information, die mir gegeben wurde, sollte er gut sein. Der einzige gute footballbasierte Antwort, die ich gehört habe, warum er fallen könnte, ist,
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
ist der Travis-Hunter-Kolosser. War er sehr gut oder war Hunter nur ein All-Welt-Talent, der einige der Dinge, die er nicht gut gemacht hat, aufgeführt hat? Ich weiß das nicht.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Ein Freund von mir hat die Argumentation gemacht, ich sprach über Manziel vorhin, dass es eine Manziel-Mike-Evans-Situation sein könnte, wo, wenn man sich darauf zurückblickt, Mike Evans ist derjenige, der Johnny Football so gut an A&M aussieht. Maybe that's one of the things. And so maybe that, so again, I don't know if he's going to be good.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
But the idea that he's, again, cannot be drafted in the first two days, based on what they're telling me, right? Because what you don't have is a bunch of football people telling you about football reasons for why they're falling in the draft. When Mel Kuyper lost his ever-loving mind during the draft, which was, I mean, that was just popcorn, like, I love the old school Mel, right?
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
When he's losing his mind, zu Louis Riddick während des Drafts, was kommt Riddick von ihm zurück, richtig? Riddick kommt nicht zurück, weil sie sagen, er hat nicht die Armstärke, um das zu machen. Er sagt das überhaupt nicht. Riddick sagt, was er hört, ist, dass es all diese Persönlichkeitsprobleme sind, diese Persönlichkeitsprobleme, diese Interviewprobleme, richtig?
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Also, selbst die NFL gibt dir nicht Football reasons for why this man fell.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
I was saying Shader. Nein, das ist okay.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Natürlich, ich kann es nicht beweisen, weil eine der Dinge, die Rassisten ziemlich gut tun, ist, nicht zu erlauben, was sie tun, während sie es tun. Also haben Sie nicht Brian Dayball, der sagt, oh, ich hätte sie gedraftet, aber oh, zu schwarz für mich. Er sagt das nicht. Und ohne diese Art von, sagen wir, Selbstkriminalität, kann ich es nicht beweisen.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Was ich sagen kann, ist, dass Sie nicht viele Situationen haben, in denen Menschen, die gedacht werden, 2. oder 3. Best Quarterback in der Draft, bis zum 3. Tag zu gehen und die meisten von ihren Sorgen um die Persönlichkeit zu haben. Das passiert einfach nicht, oder? Nein, nein.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Es ist wirklich nicht so. Und hier ist eine andere Sache, Dan, und ich nehme deinen Punkt. Wieder einmal, du kannst nicht beweisen, du kannst nicht isolieren. Es ist nie, es ist, wir haben nicht die Kontrolle, die perfekte Kontrollgruppe gesetzt, um den Punkt auf dem Niveau des wissenschaftlichen Methodes zu beweisen.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Aber wir müssen uns auch daran erinnern, dass wir argumentieren, ob Deon, ob sein Vater, ob seine berühmte Linie ihn verletzt hat. Ich denke, was wir ziemlich klar sagen können, ist, dass es ihm nicht geholfen hat. Und es hilft immer weißen Leuten. Look at the Manning example.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
If you have concerns about his personality, his preparation and offensive line and all this kind of stuff, but you know he's coming from a famous quarterback family, he's coming from a famous football family. If you're white, that usually helps. That usually helps arrest the slide, if you will. Anybody think, if Arch Manning ends up being Pretty decent. And all early indications are that he is.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Although, since I mispronounced Shadora, I should do the same. If Ark Manning ends up... Die sind ziemlich gut, richtig? Glauben wir, dass er in die fünfte Runde schlägt? Weil die Leute sich über die Manning-Familie überrascht haben. Sie haben zu viel Macht in der NFL.
The Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz
The Big Suey: Who is No. 7? (feat. Elie Mystal)
Du willst nicht, dass Mannings, du willst nicht, dass Eli und Peyton in der SPN-Ruhe sitzen, um es wieder zu analysieren und es in deinem Spielbuch zu überprüfen. Wir wollen nicht, dass die Manning-Familie bei uns ist, also werden wir nicht unsere Arche draften. Das ist verrückt.