Menu
Sign In Pricing Add Podcast

Cari Cesarotti

Appearances

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1003.962

Yeah, absolutely. So sort of the jargon that you might hear people use in particle physics is the hierarchy problem. Um, and if you are not thinking about it all the time, it's kind of easy to write off as, well, is this really a problem? Are you just looking to keep yourselves relevant?

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1020.6

Um, but you know, effectively how I like to describe it is, you know, I, I loved all the sitcoms from the nineties or whatever, where it's like, oh no, like something is going to close unless we find $35,629 and 15 cents. And then behind them, you see the banner that's like talent show grand prize.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1040.927

35,000 dollars 629 and 13 cents I think that was the same number but yeah like the fact that there are numbers that can that for some reason are so big and yet agree down to such a small accuracy is something that should be fundamental fundamentally puzzling right good so let's let's be a little bit more explicit now you know we've we've

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1075.27

I mean, these days, kind of hard to disentangle, honestly. Yeah, so the hierarchy problem is something specific to understanding the mass of the Higgs boson, which is one of the bosons in the standard model. And the Higgs is the weirdest particle in the standard model by far. It is the only particle that has the properties that it has.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1095.433

So like I said earlier, a lot of particles sit in three generations. The Higgs boson does not. The Higgs boson stands as a very weird outsider. that you may have heard is responsible for giving particles mass. And if you want to learn all about that, there's a beautiful book by Matt Strassler that you should definitely check out. Very good.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1114.982

But the Higgs boson gives particles mass, has different what we'll call intrinsic properties. It's called the spin in specific. That doesn't match any other particle. And because of that, effectively, we think that the Higgs boson should have a mass 10 to the 18 times bigger than it does. And so this is the hierarchy problem.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1140.179

And the hierarchy is just the mass scale that we expect and the mass scale that we see everything else sitting at. And the fact that there's 10 to the 18 differences, I mean, really 10 to the 32, because it's squared and that's the real first principles number. The fact that something can be off by 32 orders of magnitude from our theoretical predictions, where did that come from, right?

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1175.687

So this is definitely questions that when I was in high school, so I was in high school right when I was ending high school when the Higgs boson was discovered. So if you guys want to calculate how old that makes me, please don't. But yeah, I remember having this exact same thought when people were like, oh, but is it the Higgs? You know, did we really discover the Higgs?

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1193.24

And I was like, well, who cares? You discovered a particle and it's right where you thought the Higgs. Like, why do you get to say, oh, is it the Higgs? You know? And the truth is, like you said earlier, is that there are a lot of ways in which we can have actual predictions using frameworks and not just models.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1209.927

So the model is the thing that the mass that we observe is plugged into versus the theoretical framework is in how we make the predictions. So given the properties that we hypothesized of the Higgs that make it a particle that could in fact give mass to other particles, Then we have the theoretical tools to make a prediction of what the mass should be.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1233.468

And so basically, because the Higgs matched the properties that we modeled it to have, then we can actually use a theoretical framework to calculate what its mass should have been if things were as simple as we hypothesized to be. So the fact that there is something going on that we don't quite understand is one of the biggest open problems of particle physics to me.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1310.68

Dark matter is for sure. And I feel like it's kind of unfair for particle physicists to claim this as strictly a particle physics problem because it could be astro, it could be cosmology. There's a lot of different buckets in which you could put the dark matter problem. But certainly if dark matter has a particle description, that is also something that the standard model should try to sort out.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1340.408

This is the biggest fight I've gotten to with my PhD advisor. Is neutrino mass new physics or not? Because one could argue... that there exists a way to account for neutrino masses in the standard model. But my response to that is you can't do it with only fundamental interactions. You have to have something that happens a little bit more complicated.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1367.435

Um, so because there does not exist a fundamental interaction term that we can write down for neutrinos that give them mass because they can't, it won't work the same way as the other particles, but the Higgs boson, um, because that that's not true. I think there, that is an example of new physics. However, I don't want to, I don't want to start a fight on that today.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1386.764

So maybe another day I'd be happy to start a fight, but yeah, neutrino oscillations inherit violation of lepton number. Something else is going on there, right? Absolutely.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1411.626

Okay. How do I say this without talking about left-handed and right-handed fields?

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1420.845

OK. So what we've seen in the standard model is that there exists left-handed and right-handed fields. And this is sort of the fundamental difference between massless versus massive particles, is the amount of what we call degrees of freedom, which you need to have an object sort of propagate. So for massive particles, they have a left and a right-handed component.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1450.548

And you can think about this, I think, with sort of relativity is the best way to sort of understand it. So if you have something that's got angular momentum, let's say that it's turning to the right. If something is massive, then you as an observer can boost yourself either in front or behind of that object. And if you are in front, you see it turning one way.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1470.991

And if you're behind, you see it turning a different way. So you need to have an object that allows to spin both to the right and to the left to be able to describe that in nature. However, if the object is massless, then it is traveling at the speed of light. And there does not exist a valid frame in which you can boost to flip that spin.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1490.549

This is why you don't need both a left and a right-handed spinning degree of freedom to describe these particles. In our standard model, we have left and right-handed degrees of freedom for all of the quarks and the electron and the muon, which is my favorite particle, and the tau. But we do not have that for the neutrinos. For the neutrinos, we only have left-handed field components.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1515.16

So if they were to get mass, you would need to have either two neutrinos and two Higgs interacting, which is different from the fermions, which is just one Higgs and two of the fermions. But that's something that we have not been able to verify if this is right.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1536.812

So neutrinos could be what we either call Majorana fermions, where they don't have to have this left and right-handed story, or they can be Dirac, where they do have a left and right-handed story, and we just haven't found the right-handed component of the neutrino yet.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1552.858

I don't know if that was way too technical or not.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1572.777

Exactly.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1576.321

Yes.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1583.837

Yeah, so if you want it to basically have the same sort of mechanism as the other fermions in the standard model, which would make sense because, again, as physicists, the thing that we say is beautiful is symmetry. If you want it to have a left-handed and right-handed component, then we just need to find a new particle that is the right-handed neutrino.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1602.383

And then it could get its math through the Higgs, and things could be similar but a bit different to the rest of the standard model. The other option that I said before to do perhaps what's Majorana, Fermion instead, is that you don't need the left and the right-handed. Is that the neutrino, you just need the one degree of freedom in the neutrino.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1624.641

And then if you have two of those degrees of freedom put together, stitched together with two Higgs's, then you can also... have the same sort of mass giving mechanism. But again, that would look very different from the standard model.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1636.454

So the fact that all the particles get their mass one way, except for this one kind of particle, which gets their mass a different way, that's still a very interesting question. And to understand how that came to be is something that would require further study.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1663.174

Yeah, and we haven't found something that's, we haven't, yeah, we haven't found definitive evidence that a single fundamental interaction could explain this. And I think, you know, as particle physicists, we love when there is a functional description, which again, is the standard model. But to have a fundamental description, that's really, I think that's really what we all chase.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1705.754

Oh, absolutely. Yeah. So this puzzle comes in a bunch of different names. I think to kind of put all of them into sort of one area that we could describe it, it's kind of the question of flavor physics. So, you know, I don't suspect particles have that different of taste, but what do I know? So flavor is just sort of another name that we give to particles to describe everything.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1728.534

how properties are different. So, you know, charge is the one that we all learn in school and that we're most familiar with because there's plus and minus charge. But particles have a lot of properties and we just kind of need names for them. So flavor is the name that we tend to give the different generations of particles. So muons are a different flavor than electrons.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1747.255

Again, how they taste is not something I can comment on. But yeah, so we call this sort of the flavor physics is sort of the study of understanding why the different generations behave a bit differently.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1766.386

Sean, if I knew.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1771.468

And the Nobel Prizes would come showering upon me.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1797.85

Yeah, so supersymmetry is a pretty well-named thing in particle physics. It's like taking the symmetries that we have, but then more. So it's supersymmetry. And basically, it's adding one extra symmetry into sort of our description of spacetime itself.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1815.339

And then the consequences of that tend to be in the simplest description of it is that all the particles we've seen in the standard model have what we call very cutely superpartners. And basically they're the same particle with very similar properties, except for fermions become bosons and bosons become fermions. So supersymmetry was an amazing idea for a lot of reasons.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1842.233

One, because it introduced an extrasymmetry, which again, we all love. And if there's a way for a symmetry to exist, oh boy, do we want it to exist. Right.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1851.4

And the problem that are really famously addressed is exactly this hierarchy problem, is that if you want to understand why you have a very, very big number as a prediction, but you see a very, very small number experimentally measured, the easiest answer is there's a symmetry that cancels something, right? A symmetry is a fancy way of just saying that there's basically a copy of something.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1873.749

So the symmetry is a way of explaining why two big numbers should almost exactly cancel. So supersymmetry, as we could have seen it before the Large Hadron Collider turned on, would have been an amazing way of explaining why the Higgs boson has a mass of around 100 GeV instead of 10 to the 18 GeV.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1895.703

So that was kind of the most exciting promise is that there was a fundamental reason why this particle was so light. And there was expectation of all these new particles that we would hope to see. And it was going to be an amazing time. And people were even worried that we couldn't find the Higgs boson because there'd be too many of these other super partners.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1916.765

Unfortunately, we turned on the LHC and we did not see the superpartners. Supersymmetry as theorized in its most beautiful pure form of having the maximal symmetry is not something that's probably realizable at this point. However, there are versions of it in which you can introduce new particles or new interactions that take you away from that perfectly symmetric case and break the symmetry.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1943.935

So, you know, of course these theories still exist and it's still worth looking for, assuming that we have the tools to do so. But at some point you're not solving the fundamental question that you asked, or you have to introduce something that basically replaces the fundamental question that you were asking. So it becomes a bit of a patchwork solution rather than a global solution.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1963.013

And that's something much less attractive.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

1986.966

Yeah, I mean, it is definitely something that really is a marker of a very healthy theory in physics, I think, is when it can sort of address many problems at once versus just, you know, picking one problem and trying to, like I said, patchwork it.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2003.978

So, yeah, it was it was a really beautiful theory that had a lot of reasons to be motivated, could address a lot of questions that we had about the standard model. And, yeah, the fact that we didn't see it, I think, has put us into a little bit of a crisis in terms of the theory world in the particle physics community.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2034.548

We could have had it all.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2044.577

Right. Yeah. And I mean, it is... I think in particle physics, certainly if you look back at the history, there's been a bit more of a give and take between theory and experiment. And so we were functioning for a long time before the Large Hadron Collider came on. We had the Tevatron at Fermilab, which really did make important discoveries too.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2068.248

But really going up to that sort of energy frontier that we could have... with the LHC was so important for the field. And we were really driven by theory for a long time. And we had this beautiful promise that there was going to be something at 100 GEV. We had many predictions that were just fundamentally breaking down that told us there had to be something up there.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2093.68

And we hoped it was the Higgs, but it could have been other things too. But we knew that there was something up there. And now we just don't have that theoretical promise, right? Is that we just know things are broken and we haven't yet been able to debug the standard model.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2108.13

So, yeah, to me, it kind of feels like now it's the time to let experiment drive a little bit and see what see what's up there. And maybe as theorists, we can look at data and get inspired again for what might be a good solution.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2125.717

I am of the opinion that yes, the Large Hadron Collider is definitely still a machine that has some discovery potential. I think we have this kind of picture. Certainly, people who know a little and not a lot about collider physics have an idea that you know, the Large Hadron Collider just turns on and then it's like this Boolean output, like new physics, no new physics.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2148.428

And there's just so many subtleties that occur between colliding the particles and a physicist understanding what's going on, right? So the way that we choose what events to look at, the way that we analyze the events, the way that we... interpret the events.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2166.696

Like there's so many things in which you could introduce a bias that would skew you away from understanding fundamentally what physics could be going on. I don't think that it's probable that we'll discover something new at the LHC, but is the question, could there be hints of something new? Absolutely.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2195.851

Yeah, and this is kind of what I did my PhD on, in fact, is the idea of how we can sort of robustly look for new physics effects. Because again, we're likely not going to get... At this point with the LHC, we're not just going to see some beautiful new resonance just falling out at a perfect sharp peak at like 2 TeV. It's possible, but it's probably pretty unlikely.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2218.865

So you kind of have to use more fundamental theoretical tools to say, you know... where are inconsistencies possible to show up versus let me just wait for the most beautiful evidence of new physics to fall into my lap.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2234.757

That's what I hope.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2259.659

Yeah, so this is a great question. And every time, certainly as a PhD student, when I listen to it, I would hear someone describe one machine and be like, well, this is the best collider. And then I would hear someone describe the other one. I'm like, no, this is the best collider. And the answer is they both have strengths.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2274.825

So when you collide something like an electron, you're basically just colliding electrons. It's a fundamental particle. So electron plus electron combines. Usually we do particles and antiparticles. So you have E plus, E minus come in, collide, produce a charge neutral state.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2292.913

And all of the energy of these two electrons colliding can be recombined into different massive particles, different momentum particles, as long as the net energy and momentum of the event is conserved. However, for proton-protons, protons are actually a big bag of stuff.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2310.093

And that bag includes the three quarks that usually we talk about when you first take your nuclear physics course or whatever in school, right? I don't know if many schools have nuclear physics, but chemistry, let's say chemistry. You have up and down quarks, basically are the primary constituents of protons at low energies. But these quarks are tied together with gluons.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2333.773

And inside the quarks, or sorry, inside the protons, especially as you start cranking these things up to really high energies, is the bag becomes much more complicated. And inside these protons, we have particles that are very cleverly named as partons because they are parts. And particles have to end in on. So partons.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2354.865

Yes.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2357.991

He did enough good things, so we can give him a break for this one. But inside this proton, all of these different partons, which include the gluons, which are those bosons that we talked about earlier, and the quarks, they kind of share the total energy of the proton. So at the LHC, we collide protons of 7-ish TeV. And no one particle inside that proton is going to have anywhere near 7 TeV.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2387.086

tends to happen that the gluons take most of the energy and then quarks also take some of the energy. So when you're really looking at a collision, it's a gluon-gluon collision or a quark-quark collision. Or even in the proton, sometimes you can have quark-antiquark pairs pop into the vacuum or pop out of the vacuum and then disappear again. And sometimes you can collide those.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2406.435

So you can have a quark-antiquark interaction. And all of these things will share the energy of the proton. So in some ways, that makes for a super interesting collider because the opportunities of what kind of particles you can collide is much bigger, right? You can collide not only up and down quarks, but strange quarks or charm quarks or gluons and some things more rare than others, of course.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2428.809

But it means that you can see all sorts of interesting signatures come out. The downside is that you never know exactly what the energy of these things are. So that can make your analysis much, much harder. And of course, you don't get that full energy of the protons. So even though the LHC runs at 14 TeV, we don't actually get to see any collision happen at 14 TeV.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2451.048

It's usually much closer to one or two.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2514.171

Yeah, often you'll hear these two machines sort of described as electrons are the precision machine because you can get very, everything's very clean, right? Like you just have electron in, electron in, and then you know the energy and the collision can be basically completely reconstructed, assuming what comes out. Versus for protons, it's like smashing cars together. There's debris everywhere.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2536.045

You don't know exactly what collided into what. And, you know, it's kind of like hitting something with a big hammer and just a bunch of stuff can come out. But knowing exactly where it came from and how it came to be is a much harder question. So protons are called... Yeah, sorry. Electron-electron is precision.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2552.557

And then proton-proton is often called discovery because you can have all that high energy available to you.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2568.942

Yeah, so that's a great point. And maybe the way that these things are named is kind of unfair to E plus, E minus machines. So like we were talking about in the beginning with the standard model, part of understanding the standard model is knowing to what degree our predictions are correct, right? Because in science, you never get to say definitively, oh, this number is correct.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2587.834

You can only measure it to a certain precision. And that's sort of the claim that you can make. So with precision machines, precision machines are standard model machines in the sense that they try to measure standard model things.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2600.099

But they are also discovery machines in sort of a roundabout way in the sense that if you were to discover something that is not matching the standard model prediction, that's a hint of a discovery. So you don't get to actually physically make the particle and point to it and say, look at this, we did it.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2617.763

But you get to say, OK, there's a discrepancy in our data, and this could be indicative of new physics. So I guess that's why, you know, we call it precision versus discovery because it can't make, it can't concretely define unambiguously that there is something new going on, but it can absolutely help us sort of know where to look when we go to the higher energies.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2655.928

Yeah, absolutely. And even if something's not new physics in the sense that there's a new particle or a new degree of freedom that we haven't accounted for, the fact that there could still be new phenomena that we haven't understood is still, of course, a super exciting discovery to make.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2681.212

Oh, boy. So this is the question of the decade for collider physicists. So there are a couple of different ideas that people want to get into. So we can go as slow or as fast through this part as you want. But to summarize quickly, there are basically three kinds of machines people want to think about making. One is a linear E plus, E minus collider.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2707.822

So you collide electron-positron or electron-anti-electron at reasonably high energies, so around a TeV or so, or maybe just near the Higgs mass to make a bunch of Higgs bosons. But you collide them in a line. So you don't get to circulate. You just collide them in a line. They either collide or they don't, and that's the end. Another option is to use circular colliders.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2730.691

So this is what the LHC and the Tevatron were, is that you circulate these particles. So if they miss their collision, they still have another chance. And if you ever studied electromagnetism in school, you know that putting things in a circle is very different than putting things in a line. So that comes up with its own complications, and we can certainly get into that.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2751.113

But in terms of circular colliders, we either think about doing a lepton collider, so either electrons or my favorite, muons, which are certainly an immature technology, or doing protons, so basically doing a bigger, badder version of what we can do at the LHC.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2784.136

So... Since these are pretty big scale projects, and since we are kind of in this exploratory range of particle physics, I think that the attitude that a lot of these funding agencies and lab directors and experimentalists who actually want to see things happen versus just be like me and dream with a Mathematica notebook, I think given this climate,

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2810.942

And the fact that we can actually study a lot of Higgs physics with somewhat low energy things. I think the current attitude is to focus on lower energy circular electron colliders. And sort of the two places in the world that are presenting the most on-shell concepts of these projects would be China with the circular electron positron collider.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2833.367

and CERN with the Future Circular Collider, or FCC, and then the FCCEE, so Electron-Electron Collider. But of course, one day it might not be future, so we'll have to rename it. But that's what it is for now.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2853.517

I mean, I talk to a lot of physicists, Sean.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2863.24

I mean, so for this next round of... experiments. The thing that the US has chosen to invest in right now is neutrino physics. So Fermilab, which is sort of our flagship particle physics laboratory near Chicago, Illinois, is committed to doing a big experiment called DUNE, and that's sort of measuring neutrino properties.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2887.311

So the lab will have to go through a lot of updates in order to make this experiment the most efficient version that it can be. And that leads us for a lot of possibilities for doing things like research and development at Fermilab.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2899.538

But I think that in combination with the fact that other big laboratories in the world are willing to and have put a lot of time and effort into sort of making a more concrete plan. Yeah, the U.S. is not going to be likely where we have the next E plus E minus circular collider.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2937.728

Yeah, that's right. So I remember I actually grew up somewhat near Batavia where Fermilab is. So when I was in high school, you know, and I was just a fan of physics, I had this great T-shirt that was like the Tevatron, like 10 years running. Woohoo. And then like the next year they announced like, well, we're shutting it down for the LHC. And I was so I was so heartbroken.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2960.044

Like, why would they turn it off like that? But I mean, yeah, these things are not cheap to run. And the fact that some other experiment could be doing basically its physics program more efficiently and then also more means that, yeah, it's probably not great to have too much repetition for these kinds of experiments. The Tavitron did a lot for particle physics.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2979.613

But now that the LHC had turned on, it just makes sense to sort of let it carry the torch.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

2999.127

Yeah, so this is, to me, what I think will be the future of particle physics. So an E plus, E minus machine is very safe in the sense that we basically know how to build it. And we think that we have all the technology that we already would need to be able to make it work the way that we need it to work. A muon collider is a big risk, big payoff kind of machine.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3024.297

And of course, as a theorist, I get to just say, ah, of course we should invest in this because my whole life is dreaming, Sean. Easy for you to say, yes. But yeah, a muon collider is a really exciting new option because, like you said, it sort of combines the aspects of being both a precision machine because they are fundamental clean objects. You're not colliding bags of stuff.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3046.552

You're combining colliding two individual particles. And because a muon is heavier, we can accelerate it to much higher energies than electrons. So an electron circular collider really can't surpass more than a couple hundred GeV. Even going up to more than 300 GeV for electron-electron is a big ask.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3069.712

And knowing if we have the magnet technology and even just the power to be able to do that is not clear at this moment. So with a muon collider is that you can break that frontier of higher energies than we've ever been able to go. You can do it in a circular machine, and you can do it in a somewhat clean environment, given the fact that muons are fundamental particles.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3090.411

So when you hear this kind of stuff, I don't know how you can not be excited, right? It's such a beautiful promise of everything you could want put into one collider.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3103.134

Yeah, well, that's kind of a bummer, eh? Microseconds.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3107.731

Yeah, so the thing with these higher generation particles is that because they have all the same properties as the lower generation particles, if you want to be fancy, we'll call them quantum numbers, and they have higher mass, is that they have this really unpleasant tendency to want to decay, which is why atoms are made out of electrons and not muons, because muons, like you say, live for 10 to the minus 6 seconds, and then they decay away to neutrinos and electrons.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3137.367

So one of the most fundamental challenges that we would have to overcome if we were to make this amazing new machine would be to accelerate particles that decay, which we have never even tried to do on this kind of scale before.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3167.014

Yeah, and when you say it like that, not so bad, eh? Just be quick. It's fine.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3185.832

That's right. Yeah, so this is already hard. So what we would need to do to make all the muons, we produce them as tertiary particles. So usually what would happen is if we have protons.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3202.242

I know. With protons or electrons, basically you just ionize things, and there's all your particles. They're stable, they're abundant. But with muons, what we do first is we need to accelerate protons to pretty low energies, so order of a couple GeV.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3221.938

And again, for reference, at the LHC, we collide things at TeV, so 1,000 times lower than what we do at the main collider, but still with some acceleration technology. So we accelerate protons to a couple of GeV, and then we just dump it into some chunk of metal. So sometimes lead, sometimes tungsten. The chunk of metal that we dump into is, in fact, a very sophisticated field of research.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3245.414

So my apologies to people who work on targetry. But you dump your protons into this material. And then they scatter around and they produce mesons. So mesons are even simpler in some ways than protons. Protons are baryons because they have three quarks. Mesons have a quark and an anti-quark. And they're lighter than baryons most of the time because they're made of less stuff.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3271.938

So these mesons can be produced. And because they're lighter than the proton, that's usually what... they'll be producing in the scattering process. And you make a ton of mesons in this process. And then the mesons are also unstable. And then they want to decay. So a big way that mesons tend to decay is into muons. Almost primarily, they always decay into muons and a muon neutrino.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3295.962

And so from there, you have this big cloud of muons that are being produced by this target. But because your protons are slow, particles aren't boosted forward. And because your mesons are even slower than your protons, they're also not very forward. So you have this really huge cloud of muons that are not at all bunched together in the pin-tight way that we would need to collide them.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3316.178

So that's just the first step. And after this already extremely difficult to engineer and optimize step, you have a something that couldn't even begin to be accelerated. But you have your muons at least.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3350.998

uh yeah yeah so this is this is something that we do need to worry about because of how tight we need that muon bunch to be um basically because you want to collide it into another bunch and if they're all big and puffy that's never going to happen exactly right it's like colliding if you you like bb pellets right it's like the further away they get the more diffuse they are and the fact that you might collide one bb pellet with another after they travel

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3378.153

some non-trivial distance is getting to be even smaller probability than what's reasonable to expect. So yeah, when you produce the muons like this, of course you get both mu plus and mu minus and you scoop them off into their two different ways to process them. But yeah, once you try to crunch 10 to the 13 muons into a cubic millimeter of space, things start to getting a bit tricky.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3410.351

Yeah, so this is basically the biggest... open question that we need to resolve as a muon collider collaboration. And so this is called 6D cooling, which sounds very cool. It sounds like you're in higher dimensional space. And really what it means is the sixth dimension is three dimensions for momentum and three dimensions for physical space.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3432.598

Because you need all these muons to be traveling not only at the same momentum, but also localized to a very small bunch. And so accelerator physicists have been working on this really for 30 years. And they've made a huge amount of progress, certainly in the last 10 years. But basically, what they do is they design these different ways that you have to have this process of

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3458.254

basically taking momentum from the muons because you can't just squeeze them together. It's like squeezing one of those plastic dog toys, right? You squeeze it in one direction, it explodes in another direction. So you need to lose momentum from the system

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3473.414

um and then you can use magnets to crunch it back together so it's this constant process of take momentum give momentum take momentum give momentum um and they need to do that basically a hundred and some times before mu1 even decays and then you need to accelerate it so this is just the process of getting it ready to accelerate you have a millionth of a second and you have a millionth of a second

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3504.45

You would think. But even that's hard. So accelerating particles that decay again are an entirely new challenge. Because one, everything in your detector is being constantly sprayed by the decay products. So there's all these other robust things that you need to account for when you're designing this. And the fact that we don't have the same

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3528.803

We don't have the time effectively to do the same kind of acceleration that we do at the LHC. At the LHC, we just kind of ramp things up and it takes 15 minutes to get those protons up to the speed. We don't have 15 minutes.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3542.207

We have a microsecond. So the kind of magnetic field that you need to set up to make this feasible is also extremely different.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3581.115

I love how dramatic we are sometimes.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3588.188

All right. Well, thanks, Chris, for saying that. Jeez. Yeah. I mean, it really cracks me up because neutrinos, when you talk about them in physics, most of the time it's just kind of like, ah, who cares? Who cares? Neutrinos. They're not going to get in your detector. Don't worry about them.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3604.532

Um, but now, now that you can attach the word death ray or death circle to that, people are like, Oh my God, neutrinos. Um, so yeah, the, the, the physics behind it is that yes, neutrinos that are more energetic will want to interact more. Um, and so we haven't had to worry about this in the past because we've never been producing TV neutrinos in a large quantity. Um,

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3629.346

The worry that we would have is not that neutrino rays zap a cow and then suddenly it's raining steak. That's not quite the picture. But what can happen is that all of these neutrinos that are coming off from your muon being circulated is they'll just travel in a straight line. They'll escape the experiment and they'll travel through dirt, right? Like they can just go through dirt.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3652.67

And if they're high enough energy, they might interact with some atom in the dirt and they could excite the atom and then that could decay. So it's the radioactivity of neutrinos activating atoms in the ground. So if this stuff is either sufficiently underground or we have ways of absorbing the neutrinos before they permeate too far or something, again, this is accelerators.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3678.35

Accelerator physicists are really, really great people that think of all kinds of wacky stuff that I would never have thought was reasonable. And this is the scientific term. You can wiggle the beam. And then when you do that, it's a diffuse enough beam that you're not activating any one patch of ground too much.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3696.307

And so the overall radiation dosage, I hate to be the person to tell you this if you don't know it, but you're always being irradiated. There are always things irradiating you. You just need a sufficiently small dose to not notice. So if you can do that, then it is in fact well below any sort of legal limit and dangerous limit that you might be approaching.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3724.494

Yeah, just wiggle it. Yeah.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3728.638

The wiggles.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3741.62

Yeah, I mean, failure is possible at every step. And I actually just got back from Fermilab yesterday to attend this really interesting workshop where people sort of get together and we're talking about what we need to make this happen. And someone showed this really beautiful table of basically all the ways in which we could fail and what impact that would have on the net collisions.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3767.822

And so, yeah, the steps of failure are first, we don't produce enough muons. So this targetry thing doesn't work. We melt the target by just dumping constant protons on it. That could fail. Cooling it could fail. We might not be able to, in fact, cool it quick enough to actually have a sufficiently high, a dense enough muon beam to get any sort of reasonable number of collisions out.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3790.268

So the cooling is by far the thing that could take us out the most. And that's the thing that we need to prove works before we actually make any sort of big steps to making the full-scale collider. So when people say muon collider R&D, basically we're talking about showing that this cooling and acceleration can happen.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3807.199

Right, the cooling or the acceleration around the actual ring is hard because, again, that requires an entirely new mechanism for accelerating things quickly. And then even just reconstructing the collisions is hard. Because again, you have all these decay products shooting off of it.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3824.747

And how do you make sure that your detector isn't constantly overwhelmed by the electrons and neutrinos coming out of these decaying muons? How do you actually see the physics of the collisions and not just the physics of muons decaying? So that's also hard. And then of course, yeah, neutrino death beam. Let's stay away from that phrasing. The neutrino radiation can be mitigated with wiggles.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3879.232

Yeah. And there's also even a whole bunch of physicists that figure out how the magnets will bend the muons. Right. So like really every sort of difficult problem we have, there's an entire specialty dedicated towards solving the problem. That being said, we definitely are a bit human power limited at this point.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3897.667

So if you're out there and you say, man, the thing I would love in life the most is to accelerate muons. Oh, my God, please call us. Yeah.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3910.997

Yeah, if you are 10 and you want to be a part of the most exciting human experiment ever made, please stay in school. We need you.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3929.748

Yeah, so I mean... I think there's a lot of ways to answer this question and I think all of them are kind of equally valid. So I think the most obvious answer that you can have is we are scientists and we want to know if you can do something, right?

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3944.021

So this is a kind of collider that we have theorized and there's no fundamental showstopper that would suggest that this is a deeply impossible task to do. So the fact that this is just a scientific challenge to see if you can collide muons. And this could open up an entire new generation of colliders, which are really effectively microscopes for the fundamental interactions.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3969.653

The fact that this is a possibility, to me, is worth doing. If you can really open up an entirely new way to do a physics experiment, that's awesome. That in itself is very cool.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

3984.646

In terms of understanding sort of the fundamental problems that we talked about in the beginning, again, what's exciting about muon colliders is this was kind of, if the technology can work, which I understand is a preposterously big asterisk to put on all of this, but if the technology can work, this is by far the fastest way to take us, the fastest and the most energy efficient and compact way to take us to that energy frontier.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4008.388

So given that we are kind of stumbling in the dark right now in terms of understanding where the Higgs comes from, what dark matter is, do neutrinos get mass from the same mechanism or a different one? Is there anything new about the standard model? Are there fourth generation particles? That one's a little bit wacky, but...

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4025.379

The fact that there are so many open questions and no one beautiful theory like we had for supersymmetry sort of explains them all to me means that we should just be explorers and we should be kind of agnostic and just do experiments in which we can sort of get the most return on our money in terms of just seeing new things.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4044.624

So going to that energy frontier, having a clean environment, getting high luminosity, that to me, is how we're going to get unstuck in particle physics. So muon colliders being the fastest way, the cleanest way, and a really novel way to see things that we've never seen before makes it something that I feel like we have to invest.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4082.526

I know. I think so much of physics, you know, there's like the meme that they have, the midwit meme, right? Where it's like the bell curve and then you have like someone saying something stupid on one side and then someone saying something a little bit educated in the middle and someone saying something, the same stupid thing, but with a lot of wisdom.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4099.653

And that to me is physics in a nutshell, right? It's like when you first start physics, you're like, oh my God, like... the detectors underground, like what if the ground shakes? And then you're like, no, come on. People have gyroscopes and there's so much engineering and the machine is so heavy. And then you're like, Oh no, but the ground shaking does in fact cause problems.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4119.768

Um, and this to me is, is the same thing with like, yeah, space use and energy efficiency. Um, At Fermilab, they're literally trying to plan what energy they can reach at a muon collider, given the amount of space we have at Fermilab. Because if you don't own the space, you can't put a collider there, it turns out.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4141.046

If you are okay with us tunneling into your basement and you live in Batavia, again, please call. But yeah, you just... You run into mountains, you run into underground rivers, you run into state borders. And so you just can't build an arbitrarily big machine and expect that, yeah, you as a scientist are immune to property law.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4163.639

Um, so that's, that's something silly and also just the cost of building a tunnel tunnels are so expensive. Oh my goodness. So the smaller you can get it, the cheaper it can be. Um, and again, it's not, we don't live in a fantasy world where every scientific thing worth doing is funded.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4179.086

So if you could have something with a smaller tunnel that gives you a whole bunch of physics results, that's probably the way to go, you know? And with energy, I mean, I don't know how political we get on your podcast. As political as we want to get. I mean, the whole Russia-Ukraine war, that is zapping Europe of all of its energy.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4200.609

And the LHC is even having reduced run capacity because there's just less energy to be had in Europe. And quite frankly, if you need to choose between warming people's houses and colliding protons, I understand that tough sacrifice we have to make. So yeah, we live in a world where there's global warming and there's war and there's territorial issues.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4225.107

And the fact that we are scientists doesn't put us above any of these issues. And we still have to be responsible stewards of public money in space.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4251.96

Look, Germans, use a blanket. Yeah, exactly.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4271.874

Yeah, so I think this is also something very exciting to me. On a personal note, again, since I grew up in Illinois, and definitely my parents were not physicists, but science supporters, generically, is having Fermilab close to your house is...

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4291.343

just gives you an appreciation that things are dynamic and it, it really, you know, it makes you feel much more energetic about the idea that, Oh, I could do research or that, you know, research is happening and it definitely gives you a sense of, you know, excitement about it all. Um, so yeah, I also have this kind of agnostic approach that, oh, I don't really care where it happens.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4313.261

I just want it to happen. But when you're close to it, you feel it. You really feel it like, oh, wow, there's an energy in the air that's not neutrinos. And you get excited, and it's just cool to be a part of it. So this is something that's really exciting as someone who's currently doing science in the U.S., is the fact that the U.S.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4336.591

might want to re-enter the world stage of particle colliders is amazing. And I think this is very indicative, and this might be the spiciest thing I say, so... I think the styles of doing physics in the US and other places, um, Europe is kind of my biggest benchmark because of the people I interact with the most, but definitely the style of physics in Europe versus the US are very different.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4363.577

Um, and I think in the US for better, for worse, we tend to be sort of the people that always want to make sort of wacky theories or just like make experiments measure things that they were not made to measure. Um, and just kind of be, yeah, quite frankly, a bit of the dreamer is that, yeah, maybe we hand wave a bit and we don't worry so closely about the 15th loop correction.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4387.427

And, you know, we're a little bit sloppy, but the fact that that, you know, when opens up the possibility of like, Oh, let's get weird with it in science, I think is something that I really like about the, the U S atmosphere and physics. Um, So if a place like China or CERN wants to go ahead and do a machine that's like the FCCEE or the CEPC, then that's great.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4413.94

And the precision physics and really measuring the standard model, I think that that's very in touch with the science goals of those communities. But then doing the weird project that's like, well, can this even work? Do we know what we're doing? This is such a far off shot. And then...

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4430.044

maybe it'll happen to me is very in line with sort of the American ideology towards doing physics, especially looking for new physics. So that to me is kind of the ideal outcome of everything is that countries that are much better about keeping track of factors of two and pi go for the precision machine and then the Americans pool the resources to put a muon collider on their soil.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4453.584

But of course, all of these projects are international, and international collaboration is not only encouraged but required to pull any of this off. So where it ends up is not zeroth order, but it definitely has an impact.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4484.144

Yeah, I think there's a lot of push and pull that needs to happen in the community right now is that, you know, we need precision, but we also need discoveries. We need experimental evidence, but we also need motivating theories and having sort of the most diverse pool of ways that we can sort of approach these problems that we don't really have a clear answer to or a clear way of proceeding on.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4505.161

I think that that's going to be the most robust way to find success.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4534.17

Oh, absolutely. There is no textbook that you can buy. There's no IKEA manual to how to build a particle collider. And so much of what's taught is just passed down between groups and training individuals and things like that. So I think sometimes it's a little bit

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4551.994

I go back and forth about how seriously I should wait this because yeah, part of it, if you just kind of sell it like that, then it feels like, okay, well you just want to keep the field of particle physics alive so that you have a job. Um, but it is just, it is much more profound.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4566.126

I think is that if you want to keep particle physics alive so that there's the possibility to have a collider, if we make a lot of progress in one, one area or another, um, then you need to preserve the, the knowledge.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4590.145

Yeah. So I think I think, again, this is something I've definitely become the person that I feel like wants to have a foot, at least in both camps, in terms of understanding sort of where these machines lie in terms of likelihood and progress and physics goals and things like that.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4608.631

So a muon collider versus an E plus E minus collider can have similar physics programs, but there's definitely strengths for one versus the other. So if you're just comparing E plus E minus and not like a future LHC at a much higher energy, the energy frontier is something completely new.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4626.278

So if you just want to see new physics directly produced above a couple hundred GeV, you need a muon collider for that. And if you want to see it produced with fundamental particles, you can't even compare it to a proton-proton machine. And just for comparison, if you were to build a 10 TeV muon collider, which sounds less than the LHC because that's 14, but because protons are composite...

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4650.592

A 10 TeV muon collider would be comparable to the physics for the average collision that you can get out of something like a 70 or 80 TeV, if not more proton-proton machine. So that 100 TeV number that you might hear thrown around by China and CERN would be comparable to a 14 TeV muon collider.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4671.048

So the fact that these are composite particles makes a big difference in terms of what energies are accessible. Yeah. So the energy frontier, you just need it. And there's a million theories that you can test. You can do things that have to do with SUSE. You can do things that are just extensions of the electroweak sector.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4691.88

You can do things that are just completely new particles or dark matter related or things like that. And a lot of the times you just need higher energies to really see the effects of these particles show up. So the energy frontier, I think, is really the most compelling reason to say that a muon collider is something that we shouldn't invest in.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4711.233

In terms of other physics programs, as we said in the beginning, the Higgs boson is definitely the most mysterious particle. And depending on exactly your ideology, you may or may not say that a Higgs boson is new physics. But I'm not NEMA, so I'm not going to say that.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4728.009

But you can study a lot of Higgs bosons in a way that you can't do at the LHC, and you can do it in a much cleaner environment in some ways, too. So attend to EV muon clutter. Given the physics program that we hope to run, you can produce 10 million Higgs bosons. And with 10 million Higgs bosons, you can study a lot.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4748.692

So if you really want to flush out the story about how the Higgs couples to itself, how it couples to other particles, how the symmetry is restored in the electroweak sector at higher energies, a muon collider is also a very good tool for that.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4762.984

So while the E plus E minus machine is usually what's billed as the Higgs factory, a muon collider could also have a lot of the complementary and overlapping physics program of that kind of machine too. So studying the Higgs and going to higher energies to give you the sound bite are really what we want to do with a muon collider.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4780.773

But those are basically the only two things that I even know what to suggest in terms of trying to resolve things like the hierarchy problem or dark matter or stuff like that.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4820.603

Okay. Well, step one, um, have three cups of coffee and two existential crises a day. Um, but okay. So my favorite model. I'll give you two answers to this. There's one model that I just hope is right and I just hope is out there just because it'd be nice. So I really hope that there's a new Z prime or vector boson out there. So I want some new spin one particle that looks like a massive photon.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4851.13

We often will call that the dark photon or a Z prime. I just want that thing to be out there.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4856.614

I think having the existence of that particle would just open so many interesting questions and it could be the portal to dark matter, it could be the portal to something else interesting, it could be something that mixes with the electroweak sector and there's all sorts of new complicated stuff when we have to reinterpret everything. So I really hope it's out there.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4888.502

Yeah, basically a heavy photon is what we're looking for. And the reason that that's exciting is because whenever you have a spin one vector particle, it couples to something else. It's charged under something else. So it could be a portal into some whole new world of physics.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4906.955

Um, and so this is the second answer that I hope that we find is I hope that we find just an entire new sector of physics. You know, it could be super symmetry. It could be all the super partners. It could be that dark matter is an entire sector and not just a single particle that accounts for everything.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4923.082

Um, I hope there's some new group of particles and I hope they're strongly interacting because I just think that that would be super fun to work on for the next 50 years. So in terms of what, What I think is out there, but I have no idea, truly.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

493.586

Hi, Sean. Thanks for having me.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4939.894

I think definitely things will have to show up between the energies that we can see and the Planck scale, which is that magic number that should set the Higgs mass. Something has to be out there. I just fundamentally can't reconcile a world where there's just 16 orders of magnitude that are empty, you know? And I don't think that this is an accident.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4963.786

I don't think the universe is this way because, you know, some supreme power fine-tuned some numbers and look where we are. I think there has to be some deeper explanation. So whether or not this stuff shows up at sort of the TEV to 10 TEV range, there are some predictions for that. Supersymmetry could be hiding in this range. Yeah.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

4985.983

there could be evidence that the Higgs boson is also a composite particle that could pop up at this energy. And really sort of the first real hint that we could see of new physics that would affect the electroweak sector is really 4 pi times the vev. So that sits right around a couple TeV, around 3 TeV. Is that a guarantee? Absolutely not. But it's a way to start. So Yeah, I don't know.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

5015.046

I just want to see something that messes with the Higgs. That's what I want to see. And whatever it is, who knows? But I think something's got to be out there.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

5041.721

Yeah, I mean, I think I got into particle physics at a very weird time. So I am finishing my first postdoc, which means that I've been in the field for about 10 years. And in that time, I have seen the Higgs boson discovered and supersymmetry not discovered. I have seen the Tevatron shut off and the LHC turn on and the plans for the Hailumi LHC to go on.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

5064.458

And now, you know, I think people have tried to convince me throughout this entire career that I've had that particle physics is dead. We don't know what we're doing. Give up and do cosmology or biology, as you suggested earlier. And I just think that can't be further from the truth because.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

5082.569

What amazing privilege I have as a young person in this field is that I get to be part of the conversation of how we unstick ourselves, right? Is how we decide what the next generation of experiments gets to be. And we get to shape this idea of, well, how do we look for new physics?

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

509.515

Ooh, interesting question. I've never had it quite posed like that. I think in some ways... It is quite beautiful in the sense that there's a lot of patterns that we see. And in physics, really the thing that we love to see is patterns. So we see that there are three generations of a lot of things. We see that the gauge bosons kind of fit nicely in one bucket.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

5099.634

And, you know, to have my whole career, well, most of my career in front of me as we go through this era of absolute, you know, change and really first order changes and how we're going to approach particle physics. I think it's an exciting time to be a particle physicist.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

5118.469

I don't think that's a very popular opinion, but it is what I have to tell myself every day to get out of bed and start my existential crises and brew that first cup of coffee.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

5132.58

Thanks, Sean.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

533.242

We see that there's the pattern of things getting heavier and things coupling more strongly to the Higgs. So in that sense, it is a very beautiful model. But in the bigger sense of where did this thing come from, it's very ugly in the sense that there's not really a fundamental explanation as to why particles look and behave the way that they do.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

561.434

Fair enough. Yeah. So in the standard model, there are basically two kinds of particles. They're either fermions or bosons. So the fermions are the things that tend to make up matter. Things like electrons are fermions. Things like quarks, which are the particles that you find inside of nucleons, are fermions.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

582.226

And then the gauge bosons are the particles that effectively tie everything together because they mediate the forces exchanged between these particles. So fermions, often we like to think of as matter. If they live long enough to survive, then they can be stable matter. And then the bosons are the force carriers.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

600.039

So things like electromagnetic fields, the particle description would be made out of bosons.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

616.817

Yeah, I mean, that's kind of funny. Whenever I think of standard model, I kind of think of like... you know, like the most beautiful, you know, like the most beautiful model, like the standard model, like the thing that you would think of when you consider a beautiful person. It's like, yeah, okay. So interesting that you have that.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

633.846

But I mean, yeah, so the model is inherently something that it's not supposed to be a first principles object, right? It models the things that we see, but it doesn't come from a deep, you know, a core principle. So in the sense that, yeah, it could move around if we find something that's in conflict with our current model, that's true.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

655.587

But so far it's done an amazing job at actually accounting for a lot of the physical phenomena we've been able to see.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

679.967

Yeah, I mean, so this is a really subtle question that I feel like you kind of roll your eyes at the first time you're taught this distinction in school, right? But yeah, a model is something that we use to account for phenomena that we observe. So it's very empirical in nature, right?

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

696.09

Like the standard model, we don't necessarily know why there are three generations of everything, but we observe them. So they go into the standard model versus something like grand unified theory would be a way of explaining sort of why everything comes together in the way they do. So certainly we can't talk about the details of grand unified theory if we're gonna talk about other things.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

716.577

But yeah, the difference is, like you mentioned, that something is first principles to motivate where it comes from versus something that's a way to kind of categorize empirical evidence that we've seen.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

734.831

It does a frustratingly good job, Sean.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

743.291

Yeah, so I mean, the kind of work that we do as particle theorists, right, is we want to basically stress test the standard model and either confirm very rare predictions that it can make and so sort of see very hard to see phenomena. show up in things like colliders, which is my personal specialty and realm of interest. And then also we want to see where it breaks, right?

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

766.436

We want to see if there are pockets of predictions that are false or that are just lacking, or we see some phenomena that's unexplained by the standard model. And that's where it's fun to be a researcher, right? Is when you try to come up with solutions to why this prediction isn't quite matching your expectation.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

797.694

Um, I mean, fair enough. Uh, and I think in fact, a lot of people have had that mentality. Um, but there are some pretty big holes in, in particle physics. And I think kind of the phase transition that we've gone through as a field in the past few decades, certainly in my career, which has been, albeit not quite as prolific as yours, Sean.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

820.823

But yeah, I mean, there's big open questions that are becoming more and more sort of nuanced versus like, ah, what the heck is this, right? Like that used to be the state of affairs is that we'd turn on our little bubble chambers and we'd look at something and be like, oh, what the heck is this? And that was a really rich, interesting time to be a physicist.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

841.499

And a lot of theories came and went and we were able to make an amazing amount of progress in such a short period of time just from experimental evidence, right? Yeah. And now I think we're in a much more subtle phase of particle physics where the questions are not so much what the heck is this, but where does this come from? Why does this look like this? What are the things that we're not seeing?

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

865.46

You know, like things that are much more fundamental towards why has the universe taken on this profile?

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

901.01

Yeah, I mean, it's so funny that you say it like that, because in some way, I feel a bit flattered to think that people think that, you know, my work is so important that anything consequential could be the fault of mine. It's like, well, thank you. My goodness. But I mean, yeah, it's just it's physics is a field that I think has always kind of suffered from.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

923.871

you know, being something that the public really enjoys as much as something like astronomy or biology, where people either see or experience much more of it. Because physics requires, as we are already seeing in this conversation you and I are having, right? Physics requires so much lead up to understanding sort of why it's surprising or exciting or interesting or puzzling, right?

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

945.082

So I think that a lot of this rhetoric comes from the fact that the LHC turned on and we just saw the Higgs boson. And it's kind of a ridiculous sentence to me to say, oh, we just saw the Higgs boson because this was like the linchpin to making sure the standard model was even first order correct.

Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

289 | Cari Cesarotti on the Next Generation of Particle Experiments

962.532

So, yeah, I mean, like the answer is just that there's not new particles showing up with sort of the unexpected frequency, which they were in sort of the 50s to 80s. And who ordered that was kind of the motto of particle physicists. But to say that that's a failure versus just the field has matured a lot, I think, is underselling all the work that people have done for the past 70 years.