Attorney

She is manipulating us.

She is manipulating us.

He said that he could notice a profound change in her demeanor. The light went out of her eyes. So there were other things like that that corroborated what he believed.

He said that he could notice a profound change in her demeanor. The light went out of her eyes. So there were other things like that that corroborated what he believed.

Zach is an extremely intelligent person. He's a very disciplined person. He's not going to be manipulated by a person.

Zach is an extremely intelligent person. He's a very disciplined person. He's not going to be manipulated by a person.

Mr. Williams has been wanting to do this from day one. Obviously, we had an obligation to make sure he's competent to make these decisions. Had to make sure his constitutional rights were protected, that he fully knew everything he charged and all the punishments that were involved. So it's taken this length of time to get here. So Mr. Williams wanted to do this from day one.

Mr. Williams has been wanting to do this from day one. Obviously, we had an obligation to make sure he's competent to make these decisions. Had to make sure his constitutional rights were protected, that he fully knew everything he charged and all the punishments that were involved. So it's taken this length of time to get here. So Mr. Williams wanted to do this from day one.

Mr. Williams has been wanting to do this from day one. Obviously, we had an obligation to make sure he's competent to make these decisions. Had to make sure his constitutional rights were protected, that he fully knew everything he charged and all the punishments that were involved. So it's taken this length of time to get here. So Mr. Williams wanted to do this from day one.

And so we got him to a point where he got what he wanted. And so now we'll move on to the next phases, and we'll see what happens then. What happens now is that there's a jury trial. There's a jury trial, and the jury has to be death qualified. And it's just like any other capital murder case.

And so we got him to a point where he got what he wanted. And so now we'll move on to the next phases, and we'll see what happens then. What happens now is that there's a jury trial. There's a jury trial, and the jury has to be death qualified. And it's just like any other capital murder case.

And so we got him to a point where he got what he wanted. And so now we'll move on to the next phases, and we'll see what happens then. What happens now is that there's a jury trial. There's a jury trial, and the jury has to be death qualified. And it's just like any other capital murder case.

And all we did today is evidence that he is guilty, but it is not proof that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. So at the next phase, the state will have the burden of providing more evidence to go along with this evidence to prove he's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If they determine that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, then we go to the next phase.

And all we did today is evidence that he is guilty, but it is not proof that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. So at the next phase, the state will have the burden of providing more evidence to go along with this evidence to prove he's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If they determine that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, then we go to the next phase.

And all we did today is evidence that he is guilty, but it is not proof that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. So at the next phase, the state will have the burden of providing more evidence to go along with this evidence to prove he's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If they determine that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, then we go to the next phase.

That next phase is a sentencing phase. And at that phase, that's when aggregating and mitigating evidence is presented to determine whether or not he would get death or life without parole.

That next phase is a sentencing phase. And at that phase, that's when aggregating and mitigating evidence is presented to determine whether or not he would get death or life without parole.

That next phase is a sentencing phase. And at that phase, that's when aggregating and mitigating evidence is presented to determine whether or not he would get death or life without parole.

After you read the defendant his Miranda rights, did the defendant acknowledge those rights? Did he choose to speak with you after that?

After you read the defendant his Miranda rights, did the defendant acknowledge those rights? Did he choose to speak with you after that?