Divided Argument
Reference Check
Dan Epps
Yeah, but it's not saying it's not worth something as precedent. It's just saying, treat this as kind of more specific. Right. That's a way of saying like the scope of our holding. It's the same thing as it being tentative though, right? Gorsuch is like it's tentative. Yes, that's true. This is not tentative, but it's focused. What else to say about this?
0
💬
0
Comments
Log in to comment.
There are no comments yet.