Divided Argument
Reference Check
Dan Epps
hardcore originalist moving away from tears of scrutiny entirely just as kavanaugh says explicitly in rahimi he's against it yeah yeah and he's not walking away from it totally no but he's saying maybe we should put less emphasis on it since they can be help focus our analysis useful maybe they're useful tools so but also let's not let's not focus on too much yeah a kennedy-esque view on them i think
0
💬
0
Comments
Log in to comment.
There are no comments yet.