Menu
Sign In Pricing Add Podcast

Divided Argument

Reference Check

2715.316 - 2727.601 Will Bode

In fact, the court says in a footnote that ByteDance clearly does not. Because it's a wholly foreign entity. Or to the extent that ByteDance's asserted expressive activity occurs abroad, that activity is not protected by the First Amendment. I guess that's different.

0
💬 0

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Log in to comment.