Menu
Sign In Pricing Add Podcast
Podcast Image

Divided Argument

Double Negatives

Thu, 30 Jan 2025

Description

Divided Argument is live from Stanford Law School, hosted by the Stanford Constitutional Law Center! We review an unusual summary reversal in a capital habeas case and the latest universal injunction developments, and discuss some of the implications of the change in administration. After that, we are joined by a very special guest to discuss the recent arguments in the excessive force case of Barnes v. Felix.

Audio
Transcription

Full Episode

00:00 - 00:11 Bailiff

Oh, yay. Oh, yay. Oh, yay. The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court. Unless there is any more question, we have to find an argument in this case.

0

00:11 - 00:17 Court Crier

All persons having business before the Honorable Supreme Court of the United States are advised to give their attention.

0

00:19 - 00:23 Will Bode

Welcome to Divided Argument, an unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast.

0

00:23 - 00:42 Dan Epps

I'm Will Vode. And I'm Dan Epps. So, Will, this is our first live show in a little while. We're here. Where are we? We're in California. California. We're at Stanford Law School at a live show sponsored by an institution that you used to be a participant in. Say more.

0

00:00 - 00:00 Will Bode

The Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School, run by Michael McConnell, my former boss and mentor in many respects, is our host here. I'm told it's the first Constitutional Law Center live podcast recording, so we're a genre innovator. So I'm excited to do that.

00:00 - 00:00 Dan Epps

So hopefully we don't make this the last one. We'll try to do our best to not totally crash and burn. So let's see what happens. So we've got some interesting stuff in store for you. We have an empty mic up here at the podium for a surprise guest. But those of us who are listening, those of you who are listening at home on the podcast, we'll have to just wait and see who that's going to be.

00:00 - 00:00 Dan Epps

So keep listening. But before we do that, what is there to catch up on?

00:00 - 00:00 Will Bode

So we've had several interesting shadow docket stuff from the Supreme Court. You're worth talking about for a minute? Sure. Okay. One of these is a case on application for a stay, McHenry versus Texas Top Cop Shop. Did you see this one?

00:00 - 00:00 Dan Epps

I did. But I got to say, the opinions are a little short. I didn't totally know what was going on. All right.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.