Menu
Sign In Pricing Add Podcast

Divided Argument

Double Negatives

839.02 - 872.771 Dan Epps

Well, the claim is that at a certain point, introducing so much irrelevant prejudicial evidence could violate due process. The thing that is interesting about this is the court had said that in a case called Payne versus Tennessee. The court here quotes this line from the opinion in the very first – from Payne in the very first opinion of this summary opinion here. Payne said, evidence –

0
💬 0

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Log in to comment.