Double Negatives

3413.024 - 3435.042 Dan Epps

All right. Anything more to say about that case? I think we – I think we're all on the same page based on the way the argument goes – went. It seemed like the respondents had – weren't really even willing to defend the strong version of the moment of the threat doctrine. And so a lot of it did seem to be how do you want to lose? What's a really narrow way we can write this opinion?