Double Negatives

1103.909 - 1130.316 Dan Epps

Or a small pile, right? I mean it's still open – they're still open for argument below about how much of it was actually relevant, necessary and so forth. But I'm just trying to figure out exactly what's going on here. So the court seems to be saying that whether something is holding or not for purposes of EDPA – is an independent question of federal law on which state courts don't get deference?