Divided Argument
Aide-de-camp
Dan Epps
to challenge a determination that he is not going to get a visa because he was found to have previously been involved in a sham marriage for immigration reasons. And it's just a debate about, is this the kind of discretionary decision that the Secretary of Homeland Security gets to make that is not reviewable? Or is it the kind of decision that's non-discretionary that is reviewable?
0
💬
0
Comments
Log in to comment.
There are no comments yet.