Divided Argument
Aide-de-camp
Will Bode
That was a 5-4 decision where just as a leader with the majority of the court were people who said they were being subjected to warrantless wiretapping, didn't have standing because they couldn't prove they were being subjected to warrantless wiretapping, even though the sort of nature of the program was that it was secret and they wouldn't know if they were being subjected to warrantless wiretapping.
0
💬
0
Comments
Log in to comment.
There are no comments yet.