Divided Argument
Aide-de-camp
Dan Epps
I don't know. It was interesting because at the argument, one thing that came up multiple times was Bostock, his famous opinion interpreting Title VII to extend protections to gay and transgender individuals. It's not directly on point because that was a statutory case and this is a constitutional case about the Equal Protection Clause, but relevant because it's the
0
💬
0
Comments
Log in to comment.
There are no comments yet.