Menu
Sign In Pricing Add Podcast

Lyn Alden

Appearances

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1508.089

Thanks for having me back. Always happy to be here.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1552.719

One of the things I emphasized was the size of fiscal deficits during that time, which were generally stimulative and all else being equal positive for markets in a nominal sense, as well as GDP running nominally on the hot side. And when we enter this year, some of that is slowly changing.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1571.889

So there's potentially fewer upside surprises in store, more downside uncertainty, things like tariffs, things like... you know, attempting to tackle the fiscal deficit in pretty kind of shock and awe ways at kind of the start of the administration. And so I think it's natural, especially because equities were priced at a pretty high valuation.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1595.915

Now, in this whole kind of decade-long period, they've been on average a little bit, you know, more highly priced than like very long-term averages. But even given this kind of cyclical ebb and flow of valuations, equity markets were a lot more highly valued than, for example, they were in the beginning of Trump's first term, if you use like a comparable baseline.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1617.701

So the combination of pretty high valuations, a lot of global capital all stuffed into U.S. markets, overweight U.S. and especially overweight U.S. large cap growth has been very much the consensus play that keeps winning. And I think for the first time in a while, there are some challenges to that. And And so I think the sell-off is natural.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1640.061

Partly how deep it has to go will depend on policy decisions. There tends to be a somewhat feedback loop there. So don't really mind 5% corrections. We start getting into 10% and people aren't really sure where the end game is. They start making noise and you see kind of rhetoric shift around that. And I think one of the ways to mitigate it was to have a fairly diversified portfolio.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1666.228

So for a long time, having international exposure was kind of an anchor on a portfolio. Whereas in this particular sell-off, international equities on average did better. It's kind of early rotation potential, as well as owning other types of assets. I mean, gold's poking around its all-time highs.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1684.391

And so it's kind of funny because when I look at a portfolio, it's like nothing to write home about, like a kind of a week, month-long period or more. But the sentiment on social media, from what I've seen, has been pretty kind of surprised. And I think it's mainly because the things that underperform the most tend to be the consensus.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1704.103

So some of the large cap growth underperformed the S&P, and then the S&P underperformed global, and that just kind of messed up a lot of people's positioning.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1776.761

I wouldn't necessarily have a different reaction, but I think I might come at it from a different time frame or a different perspective. So one of the things I have been writing about for a while is the structural U.S. trade deficits and why they do matter. And I've pointed out that that's pretty tied at the hip with the dollar being the reserve currency.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1795.532

So basically, compared to most other currencies other than maybe one or two other sizable ones, there's a lot of countries that want to hold U.S. assets or U.S. currency directly. It's basically the biggest, most saleable network effect for money in the world at the current time. And so a lot of international contracts and trade are priced in dollars. A lot of financing is priced in dollars.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1816.727

So a lot of countries and corporations have dollar-dominated debt. that's not even owed to American entities. It's often owed to European entities or owed to other foreign entities. It's basically cross-border dollar financing. And so that's this really powerful network effect.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1832.843

And so for most currencies, they tend to trade on things like industry differentials, trade balance differentials, things like that. There's kind of this control loop that happens if a currency gets too expensive, too cheap. The dollar is kind of different because it has this more structural bid

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1848.556

on top of the normal things like industry differentials and trade, because basically the whole world needs dollars. And the way that they get dollars is basically we just pour them out like, you know, trillions of dollars over time, generally through structural trade deficits. And the mechanism is that because so many people hold it, they kind of inflate the value of the dollar.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1868.504

So our import strength gets, you know, stronger. And our ability to export lower margin things shrinks. And so we can be good at tech, healthcare, and finance, but it's hard to be good at manufacturing in that environment. And when you run that policy for decades, you kind of hit more critical parts. You get more deindustrialization.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1889.776

You get rising populist politics and changes on the electoral map. So I start from the viewpoint that the trade deficits do matter. And it's not surprising to see that increasingly become a political touchpoint. But I do think that the shock and awe tariff policy is likely to have backlash. I think we're already seeing that. So it's not necessarily to say that I endorse that approach.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1912.099

And the other thing that I generally point to is if you kind of look at the administration, there's obviously different actors in it. One of the ways to help at least understand the somewhat intellectual framework that they're doing is Stephen Mirren wrote a paper. He's Trump's nominee for his chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1933.325

He wrote a paper in November of 2024 that talked about realigning global trade. And it kind of laid out, it's kind of like the more intellectual, like if you were a steel man, what they're trying to do, that's the paper to read because that's kind of the,

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1949.175

you know, the more intellectual version, which is, okay, he kind of looks at tariffs, he looks at the trade balance, he looks at some of these things I just talked about, then says, okay, which approaches could address that? And then what are the risks of using those approaches? Because he freely admits these are risky tools to be using.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

1966.926

So I think that in the context of understanding some of the voices in the administration to see what they're at least trying to do, I get that. But yeah, I would generally agree with the consensus view that tariffs are more likely to slow down or impair an economy than help it.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2007.705

It adds uncertainty and it adds costs. And so around the margins, it can change where those things go. Now, the issue is that tariffs can impact in the very short term. You can just flip a switch and tariffs are on, whereas supply chains take a very long time, especially at scale, to move. And so my original background is engineering.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2026.016

So I always kind of look at things from a pretty tangible perspective. It's easy to kind of sit in New York or sit in Washington and kind of look at everything, numbers on a chart. But when you actually are moving facilities, moving logistics hubs and things like that, that's actually a really time-consuming thing. So in the near term, it's likely to be inflationary and disruptive.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2043.997

Longer term, I think the best case scenario is it can kind of signal a priority shift. In that paper, The Economist covers not just the tariff side, but also, ironically, trying to discourage the rest of the world from stashing all their excess value in U.S. financial assets and overvaluing the dollar because of that.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2063.052

So it's kind of like this one-two punch of trying to make imports more expensive and also trying to discourage excess capital recycling.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2102.359

So I think it's a potential turning point. And I started writing about that last year before all the terror stuff came into effect. My initial catalyst was the U.S. was entering a rate cutting cycle. And so it'd be the first window since 2019 that that could be a catalyst for some of those capital outflows.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2122.245

Now, 2019 didn't really end up doing that because within a year, COVID hit and the big US network tech stocks really benefited from that. And also the US did more fiscal and kind of came out a little bit more explosively than the rest of the world, while China and other places were still kind of in contraction mode. And so that didn't work out last time.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2146.635

And so my kind of framework is this is the next window for it. Now, a window doesn't mean it's going to happen, but it basically means that it's one of the first higher probability areas in a while. The area of my portfolio that has been more challenging has been expecting a little bit more of a rotation earlier. So I've been early on that trade. So I've kind of

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2168.157

I'm always a little bit cautious to say, okay, this is the big rotation because I'm mindful of the difficulty of making that call. But I do continue to hold the view that it's more likely than not that this is early sign of a rotation because now there are a number of things there. There's the initial rate-cutting period. Then there's all the tariff uncertainty.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2191.585

Then there's the fact that I've been emphasizing China because They've been in a balance sheet recession for a while. They're trying to deflate their property market. It kind of deflates bubbles there at kind of a gradual pace. But last year, they started to hit certain pain points on Chinese social media.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2209.638

It was starting to come up and then they were starting to hit red lines in the equity market where their kind of priorities shifted. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2440.066

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

2646.991

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3003.217

,,,,,,, Now, the part that I would see a little bit differently is it's not quite the same as holding five stocks the president's like because Bitcoin doesn't pass the Howey test. So it's effectively a digital commodity. It's an asset without an issuer. And so I do put it more on gold in that case with the caveat that it's still a fairly small asset.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3045.862

And this does obviously benefit those who hold Bitcoin or they're bullish on Bitcoin. So it does, you know, potentially help certain constituents, not others. And as you point out, many of them did lobby for it.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3059.166

And so I don't really disagree with that part other than to clarify that I would see a big difference between them doing with Bitcoin versus them doing with crypto XYZ that literally had VCs, founders, a pre-mine, insiders, things like that. It is somewhat different. But at the end of the day, it is basically just an investment decision. If Bitcoin should...

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3082.828

over the coming five, 10 years, go up five or 10x in price, then they have effectively made a good investment decision. Whereas if it stagnates, if it goes down, then it will have been a waste.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3095.431

Now, I think at the scale that they're doing it on, it probably gets disproportionate attention in the sense that, you know, they're not saying, hey, we want to go out and accumulate trillions of dollars with this. They're basically saying the, you know, the couple hundred billion we have, which is, you know, month or two of fiscal deficits and a pretty small fraction of the gold reserve.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3117.297

So it's kind of, you know, I think there is controversy to it, but I kind of put it on small enough potatoes that, you know. It is what it is, and it's a little bit different than a security.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3151.201

So I haven't made any major decisions, but the parts of the portfolio that are working or not working are certainly changing. So it used to be that the U.S. growth stocks were great. Obviously, Bitcoin and MicroStrategy were great. The gold slice has been, you know, I purposely was kind of a bond bearer and wanted some of that slice in gold, which has been a good decision.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3171.563

The part that I mentioned before, the anchor, has been the international equities. And to a lesser extent, the U.S. kind of dividend stocks. The U.S. stocks are doing pretty good, but they're not the MAG-7, for example. And the recent rotation is basically saying that there might be some current wake-up on overvaluation among U.S. growth and a little bit of wake-up on opportunities elsewhere.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3194.282

And one thing I'd like to point out is that it's not just tech. Everybody focuses on, obviously, that tech is popular and expensive. But I've been highlighting the fact that Costco has been trading at 60 times earnings. And it's a 45-year-old retailer. I'm not even sure exactly what date, but it's a four or five decade old retailer. It's a great company. I mean, their growth numbers are good.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3216.095

I'm very bullish on the underlying company, just not at 60 times earnings. And so there's actually a lot of things like that that are just priced, maybe not that extreme, but there's a lot of things that are just priced pretty expensively. And so I think we're entering the period where that starts to matter.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3234.076

But because I have been concerned for that for a while, I'm already positioned for some of that. And the caveat that is that during, you know, where only U.S. growth mattered, the equity side had a little bit of anchor on it, which lately has turned into a little bit of a booster. And so it's not that I'm making changes, it's that I'm noting things that are happening.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3253.949

And I think my biggest question now is to see if this has follow through. because I mentioned that the rotation has been a very hard call to make. I think this has likes to it, but I do want to see continued evidence that it has likes to it.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3309.733

I think I would look for areas of overvaluation, things that you're not comfortable with, and reduce those overweight positions. The S&P 500 is very concentrated. The NASDAQ 100 is very concentrated. I do still think there's pockets of value in the U.S., just generally not in the big U.S. growth. And I also differentiate on a company-by-company basis.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3331.586

Apple is a case that I've not been bullish on that for a while just because it's kind of a value stock that's priced like a growth stock. Um, and that, that's been the challenge. Um, when you look internationally, there are pockets, you know, like, and it's funny cause some of them have the same issues. Like, uh, Brazil has had some friction lately because of its, of its budget deficits.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3352.653

Um, but the budget deficits have not really been that different than the U S and it's just a matter of whether or not there's external demand for the currency and the assets or not. Um, But I generally, I find I've been less bearish on Brazil than it seems like the average consensus investor was, especially given some of the valuations and opportunities there.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3371.849

Like I said, I have been bullish on China with the caveat that there's a small percentage that something geopolitically happens and it entirely messes up that side of the portfolio. Kind of like what we saw with Russia, for example. And so it's like, 90% chance, I was like, these are undervalued, super cheap. you know, they actually became more shareholder friendly.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3394.468

So for some of the big Chinese tech stocks were like initiating dividends or buying back shares when they were super cheaply priced. And I mean, that's kind of a change in that space. So more shareholder friendly policies. I do think that there are a lot of pockets out there that are quite interesting. And Europe, I have historically found a little bit less compelling.

Prof G Markets

Searching For Value Outside the U.S. — ft. Lyn Alden

3415.834

But, you know, when it's been dead money for a while and you do have marginal fiscal waking up It's nice to own some of that, at least compared to American dividend stocks. You can look around and say, are there ways I can diversify my value or dividend exposure?